THE MAGNITUDE OF THE STOMATAL RESPONSE TO BLUE-LIGHT - MODULATION BY ATMOSPHERIC HUMIDITY

被引:9
作者
ASSMANN, SM [1 ]
GRANTZ, DA [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS,EXPT STN HSPA,AIEA,HI 96701
关键词
D O I
10.1104/pp.93.2.701
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The effect of leaf-air vapor pressure difference (VPD) on the magnitude of the stomatal response to blue light was investigated in soybean (Glycine max) by administering blue light pulses (22 seconds by 120 micromoles per square meter per second) at different levels of VPD and temperature. At 20°C and 25°C, the magnitude of the integrated conductance response decreased with increasing VPD (0.4 to 2.6 kiloPascals), due to an earlier onset of stomatal closure that terminated the pulse response. In contrast, at 30°C this magnitude increased with rising VPD (0.9 to 3.5 kiloPascals), due to an increasing maximum excursion of the conductance response despite the accelerated onset of stomatal closure. When the feedforward response of stomata to humidity caused steady state transpiration to decrease with increasing VPD, the magnitude of the pulse-induced conductance response correlated with VPD rather than with transpiration. This suggests that water relations or metabolite movements within epidermal rather than bulk leaf tissue interacted with guard cell photobiological properties in regulating the magnitude of the blue light response. VPD modulation of pulse magnitude could reduce water loss during stomatal responses to transient illumination in natural light environments.
引用
收藏
页码:701 / 709
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   ENHANCEMENT OF THE STOMATAL RESPONSE TO BLUE-LIGHT BY RED-LIGHT, REDUCED INTERCELLULAR CONCENTRATIONS OF CO2, AND LOW VAPOR-PRESSURE DIFFERENCES [J].
ASSMANN, SM .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 87 (01) :226-231
[2]   STOMATAL RESPONSE TO HUMIDITY IN SUGARCANE AND SOYBEAN - EFFECT OF VAPOR-PRESSURE DIFFERENCE ON THE KINETICS OF THE BLUE-LIGHT RESPONSE [J].
ASSMANN, SM ;
GRANTZ, DA .
PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 1990, 13 (02) :163-169
[3]  
Cowan I. R., 1977, Advances in Botanical Research, V4, P117, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2296(08)60370-5
[5]   FEEDFORWARD RESPONSES OF STOMATA TO HUMIDITY [J].
FARQUHAR, GD .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1978, 5 (06) :787-800
[6]   THE EFFECT OF HUMIDITY AND LIGHT ON CELLULAR WATER RELATIONS AND DIFFUSION CONDUCTANCE OF LEAVES OF TRADESCANTIA-VIRGINIANA L [J].
FRENSCH, J ;
SCHULZE, ED .
PLANTA, 1988, 173 (04) :554-562
[7]   SOIL-WATER STATUS AFFECTS THE STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE OF FULLY TURGID WHEAT AND SUNFLOWER LEAVES [J].
GOLLAN, T ;
PASSIOURA, JB ;
MUNNS, R .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1986, 13 (04) :459-464
[8]  
GRANTZ DA, 1987, PLANT CELL ENVIRON, V10, P197
[9]   STOMATAL RESPONSES TO LIGHT AND LEAF-AIR WATER-VAPOR PRESSURE DIFFERENCE SHOW SIMILAR KINETICS IN SUGARCANE AND SOYBEAN [J].
GRANTZ, DA ;
ZEIGER, E .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1986, 81 (03) :865-868
[10]   LEAF CONDUCTANCE RESPONSE TO HUMIDITY AND WATER TRANSPORT IN PLANTS [J].
HALL, AE ;
HOFFMAN, GJ .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1976, 68 (06) :876-881