The Open Access Divide

被引：3
作者：
Xia, Jingfeng [1 ]
机构：
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Informat & Comp, 755 W Michigan St,Ul 3100B, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
来源：
PUBLICATIONS | 2013年 / 1卷 / 03期
关键词：
scholarly information sharing; self-archiving; data; publications; open access;
D O I：
10.3390/publications1030113
中图分类号：
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号：
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要：
This paper is an attempt to review various aspects of the open access divide regarding the difference between those academics who support free sharing of data and scholarly output and those academics who do not. It provides a structured description by adopting the Ws doctrines emphasizing such questions as who, what, when, where and why for information-gathering. Using measurable variables to define a common expression of the open access divide, this study collects aggregated data from existing open access as well as non-open access publications including journal articles and extensive reports. The definition of the open access divide is integrated into the discussion of scholarship on a larger scale.
引用
收藏
页码：113 / 139
页数：27
相关论文
共 125 条
[1]  
AHA, 2013, THESIS AHA
[2]  
ANDREW T, 2003, ARIADNE, V37
[3]   Self-archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciences [J].
Antelman, K .
LEARNED PUBLISHING, 2006, 19 (02) :85-95
[4]  
Augustine A., 1863, RHETORES LATINI MINO, P141
[5]   Making tenure viable - Listening to early career faculty [J].
Austin, AE ;
Rice, RE .
AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 1998, 41 (05) :736-754
[6]  
Austin Anthony, 2008, ACAD AUTHORSHIP PUBL
[7]  
Bankier J. G., 2009, SERIALS LIB, V56, P109, DOI DOI 10.1080/03615260802665423
[8]  
BANKIER JG, 2008, P ELPUB 2008 C EL PU, P68
[9]   THE SIGNIFICANCE OF DISCIPLINARY DIFFERENCES [J].
BECHER, T .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1994, 19 (02) :151-161
[10]  
Becher T., 2001, ACAD TRIBES TERRITOR
12345678910