Application of the Loughborough Construction Accident Causation model: a framework for organizational learning

被引:63
作者
Behm, Michael [1 ]
Schneller, Arthur [2 ]
机构
[1] East Carolina Univ, Technol Syst, 231 Slay Hall, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
[2] East Carolina Univ, Technol Syst, Sci & Technol 200, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
关键词
Accident; organizational learning; safety;
D O I
10.1080/01446193.2012.690884
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In order for the construction industry to improve its poor safety performance it needs to learn from its safety mistakes and put the lessons learned to good use. Incident investigation theories and techniques vary widely in the peer-reviewed literature. The Loughborough Construction Accident Causation (ConAC) model was applied to State Department of Transportation construction accidents, and is proposed as a tool to facilitate organizational learning in the construction industry. Details of the methodology utilized are described so that it can be duplicated in research and in practice. By investigating 27 DOT construction incidents, the research demonstrates how the model can be used both in research and in practice. The model yielded 6.63 causes/factors/influences identified per incident, and correlated the causes to determine relationships. Incident causality is complex and multi-faceted. The Loughborough model facilitates a holistic view of incident causality and thus organizational learning.
引用
收藏
页码:580 / 595
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
[31]   Scorecard approach to benchmarking organizational safety culture in construction [J].
Mohamed, S .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 129 (01) :80-88
[32]   Characteristics of worker accidents on NYSDOT construction projects [J].
Mohan, S ;
Zech, WC .
JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2005, 36 (04) :353-360
[33]   Framework for Measuring Corporate Safety Culture and Its Impact on Construction Safety Performance [J].
Molenaar, Keith R. ;
Park, Jeong-Il ;
Washington, Simon .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2009, 135 (06) :488-496
[34]  
Portney LG., 2000, FDN CLIN RES APPL PR, V2nd
[35]  
Ranasinghe M., 2000, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V18, P395, DOI DOI 10.1080/01446190050024815
[36]   Human error: models and management [J].
Reason, J .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7237) :768-770
[37]  
Reason J., 1997, MANAGING RISKS ORG A
[38]  
Saurin T.A., 2004, CONSTR MANAGE EC, V22, P159, DOI DOI 10.1080/0144619042000201367
[39]   Accident investigation reporting deficiencies related to organizational factors in machinery space fires and explosions [J].
Schroder-Hinrichs, Jens U. ;
Baldauf, Michael ;
Ghirxi, Kevin T. .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2011, 43 (03) :1187-1196
[40]   Comparison of some selected methods for accident investigation [J].
Sklet, S .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2004, 111 (1-3) :29-37