DETERMINANTS OF BREAST-CANCER DETECTION AMONG WISCONSIN (UNITED-STATES) WOMEN, 1988-90

被引:29
作者
REEVES, MJ
NEWCOMB, PA
REMINGTON, PL
MARCUS, PM
机构
[1] UNIV WISCONSIN,CTR COMPREHENS CANC,MADISON,WI
[2] CTR DIS CONTROL & PREVENT,DIV FIELD EPIDEMIOL,ATLANTA,GA 30341
关键词
BREAST CANCER; DETECTION; FEMALES; MAMMOGRAPHY; SCREENING; UNITED STATES;
D O I
10.1007/BF00052770
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Early detection is advocated widely as the best method to reduce the high rate of breast cancer mortality in women. The purpose of this study was to describe the detection histories of women with breast cancer and to identify factors related to the method of detection. During the period 1988-90, 3,197 women with invasive breast cancer, identified through the Wisconsin (United States) tumor registry, were interviewed The method of cancer detection (classified as self, screening mammography, or clinical breast examination [CBE]) was analyzed using polychotomous logistic regression. Fifty-five percent (1,754/3,197) of the women found their own cancers, while 35 percent (1,122/3,197) were detected by screening mammography. Compared with self-detection, the likelihood of non-localized disease was significantly lower for tumors detected by mammography (odds ratio [OR] = 0.3, 95 percent confidence interval [CI] = 0.2-0.4) and CBE (OR = 0.6, CI = 0.4-0.7). The likelihood of cancer being detected by screening mammography increased with increasing age, education, number of prior mammograms, family history, and body mass index (weight/height(2)) (BMI). Women in the highest BMI quintile were 2.3 times (CI = 1.7-3.0) more likely than women in the lowest BMI quintile to have their cancers diagnosed by mammography. This association most likely results from breast tumors being more difficult to palpate in heavier women.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 111
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1988, SAS STAT USERS GUIDE
  • [2] THE VALUE OF MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING IN WOMEN UNDER AGE 50 YEARS
    EDDY, DM
    HASSELBLAD, V
    MCGIVNEY, W
    HENDEE, W
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1988, 259 (10): : 1512 - 1519
  • [3] FARWELL MF, 1993, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V128, P510
  • [4] Fleiss JL., 1981, STAT METHODS RATES P, V2
  • [5] FOSTER RS, 1984, CANCER, V53, P999, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19840215)53:4<999::AID-CNCR2820530429>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-N
  • [7] BEHAVIORAL AND BIOLOGICAL DETERMINANTS OF SURGICAL STAGE OF BREAST-CANCER
    GOULDMARTIN, K
    PAGANINIHILL, A
    CASAGRANDE, C
    MACK, T
    ROSS, RK
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1982, 11 (04) : 429 - 440
  • [8] ESTIMATED EFFECT OF BREAST SELF-EXAMINATION AND ROUTINE PHYSICIAN EXAMINATIONS ON BREAST-CANCER MORTALITY
    GREENWALD, P
    NASCA, PC
    LAWRENCE, CE
    HORTON, J
    MCGARRAH, RP
    GABRIELE, T
    CARLTON, K
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1978, 299 (06) : 271 - 273
  • [9] HAAGENSEN CD, 1971, DISEASES BREAST, P445
  • [10] HARRIS JR, 1993, NEW ENGL J MED, V327, P319