Process and quality of peer review in scientific Nursing journals

被引:1
作者
Chien, Wai Tong [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Sch Nursing, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
peer review; nursing journals; readership;
D O I
10.4081/nursrep.2011.e5
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
To be high quality and international recognized scientific journal for health care professions, such as medical and nursing disciplines, a well-structured and effective peer review system is of an utmost importance. Beckstead (2009) in his guest editorial published in the September issue of International Journal of Nursing Studies suggested that it was important for authors, as well as editors and publishers, to have a clear understanding of whom the intended readers of the journal are; and for the peer reviewers, to answer a key question: whom are we writing to? and more importantly, to assure a transparent, rigorous and quality peer-review. Their questions and declarations stimulated us to think about two important issues: first, the importance of a high quality and effective peer-review in a scientific nursing journal and second, the peer-review system, its monitoring and contribution to quality improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 23
页数:3
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Beyond objective and balanced: Writing constructive manuscript reviews [J].
Bearinger, LH .
RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2006, 29 (02) :71-73
[2]   Peer-reviewed scientific journals in nursing: To whom are we writing? [J].
Beckstead, Jason W. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2009, 46 (09) :1166-1167
[3]   What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal? [J].
Black, N ;
van Rooyen, S ;
Godlee, F ;
Smith, R ;
Evans, S .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (03) :231-233
[4]   Effect of written feedback by editors on quality of reviews - Two tandomized trials [J].
Callahan, ML ;
Knopp, RK ;
Gallagher, EJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (21) :2781-2783
[5]  
Drazen JM, 2006, NY TIMES
[6]   PEER REVIEWER TRAINING AND EDITOR SUPPORT: RESULTS FROM AN INTERNATIONAL SURVEY OF NURSING PEER REVIEWERS [J].
Freda, Margaret Comerford ;
Kearney, Margaret H. ;
Baggs, Judith Gedney ;
Broome, Marion E. ;
Dougherty, Molly .
JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING, 2009, 25 (02) :101-108
[7]  
Godlee F, 2003, PEER REVIEWER HLTH S
[8]  
Hames Irene, 2007, PEER REV MANUSCRIPT
[9]  
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, 2009, ETH CONS COND REP RE
[10]   Quality assessment of reviewers' reports using a simple instrument [J].
Landkroon, Annenzieke R. ;
Euser, Anne Margriet ;
Veeken, Hans ;
Hart, Wimpeter ;
Overbeke, A. John P. M. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 108 (04) :979-985