Activism and the Online Mediation Opportunity Structure: Attempts to Impact Global Climate Change Policies?

被引:25
作者
Uldam, Julie [1 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Intercultural Commun & Management, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
activism; climate change; mediation; opportunity structure; radical democracy;
D O I
10.1002/poi3.22
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The annual United Nations (UN) Framework Convention on Climate Change conferences provides a transnational mediation opportunity structure for activist networks to contest policies that favor market-based models for solving the climate crisis. Online technologies, including commercial social media, have arguably increased possibilities for being involved in protests on a transnational level. However, this article shows how online modes of action privilege lobbying tactics over civil disobedience tactics, arguing that the former is often incommensurate with an anticapitalist climate approach to climate change activism. This impedes possibilities for using online media to protest at the radical end of the climate justice movement spectrum. This article explores this interrelationship between activist demands and (online) modes of action through a focus on the mobilization efforts of London-based activists for the 17th UN climate conference in 2011.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 75
页数:20
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Askanius Tina, 2011, International Journal of Electronic Governance, V4, P69, DOI 10.1504/IJEG.2011.041708
[2]   Protest logics and the mediation opportunity structure [J].
Cammaerts, Bart .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2012, 27 (02) :117-134
[3]  
Cammaerts B, 2007, EUR COMMUN RES EDUC, P265
[4]  
Carpentier, 2011, HDB GLOBAL MEDIA COM, P113
[5]  
Castells M., 2009, COMMUNICATION POWER
[6]   The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance [J].
Castells, Manuel .
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2008, 616 :78-93
[7]   Articulating Climate Justice in Copenhagen: Antagonism, the Commons, and Solidarity [J].
Chatterton, Paul ;
Featherstone, David ;
Routledge, Paul .
ANTIPODE, 2013, 45 (03) :602-620
[8]  
Chouliaraki L., 2010, CRIT DISCOURSE STUD, V7, P227, DOI DOI 10.1080/17405904.2010.511824
[9]  
Chouliaraki L., 2010, CRIT DISCOURSE STUD, V7, P305, DOI [10.1080/17405904.2010.511839, DOI 10.1080/17405904.2010.511839]
[10]   Rethinking the fragmentation of the cyberpublic: From consensus to contestation [J].
Dahlberg, Lincoln .
NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2007, 9 (05) :827-847