A COMPARISON OF OMEPRAZOLE AND RANITIDINE FOR DUODENAL-ULCER IN SOUTH-AFRICAN PATIENTS - A MULTIRACIAL STUDY

被引:12
作者
MARKS, IN
DANILEWITZ, MD
GARISCH, JAM
机构
[1] UNIV CAPE TOWN,DEPT MED,GASTROINTESTINAL CLIN,CTR 1,CAPE TOWN,SOUTH AFRICA
[2] PROVINCIAL HOSP,GASTROINTESTINAL CLIN,CTR 3,PORT ELIZABETH,SOUTH AFRICA
[3] JOHANNESBURG HOSP,DEPT MED,GASTROENTEROL UNIT,CTR 2,JOHANNESBURG,SOUTH AFRICA
关键词
OMEPRAZOLE; RANITIDINE; DUODENAL ULCER; MULTIRACIAL; ONCE DAILY;
D O I
10.1007/BF01296805
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The study was a multicenter double-blind parallel-group comparison of omeprazole, a proton-pump inhibitor, with the H2-receptor antagonist, ranitidine, in 206 patients with duodenal ulcer. There were 145 men and 62 women of mixed racial origin with an average age of 40 years (range 19-76); 63 of them were white, 7 black, 135 coloured and 1 Asian. Each drug was given for four weeks and ulcer healing rate, symptom relief, and adverse events were recorded and compared between treatment groups. Patients received either 20 mg omeprazole once daily in the morning (N = 104) or ranitidine 300 mg once daily at night (N = 106). Healing rates were significantly higher in the omeprazole group than in the ranitidine group at both two weeks (80% vs 52%, P < 0.001) and four weeks 95% vs 85%, P < 0.05), using the "per protocol" approach, and these results were confirmed using the "intention to treat" approach. Omeprazole-treated patients reported significantly less daytime epigastric pain (P = 0.02) and heartburn (P = 0.04) after two weeks than ranitidine-treated patients. By four weeks, there were no significant differences in symptom in reporting between groups. Both treatments were well tolerated, and there were no serious adverse events.
引用
收藏
页码:1395 / 1400
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] IMPROVED DUODENAL-ULCER HEALING WITH PANTOPRAZOLE COMPARED WITH RANITIDINE - A MULTICENTER STUDY
    VANRENSBURG, CJ
    VANEEDEN, PJ
    MARKS, IN
    ZAK, J
    SIMJEE, AE
    MOOLA, SAH
    SPIES, SK
    BUCHEL, E
    GRUNDLING, HD
    VANZYL, JH
    MEKEL, R
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 1994, 6 (08) : 739 - 743
  • [22] RANITIDINE AND ANTACIDS IN THE PREVENTION OF DUODENAL-ULCER RELAPSE IN GREECE
    KALANTZIS, N
    THEODOROPOULOS, G
    KATSAROS, D
    TZIVRAS, M
    FERTAKIS, A
    ARCHIMANDRITIS, A
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1992, 39 (03) : 277 - 279
  • [23] DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF PANTOPRAZOLE AND OMEPRAZOLE FOR THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE DUODENAL-ULCER
    BEKER, JA
    PORRO, GB
    BIGARD, MA
    DELLEFAVE, G
    DEVIS, G
    GOUEROU, H
    MAIER, C
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 1995, 7 (05) : 407 - 410
  • [25] Comparison of omeprazole and ranitidine for stress ulcer prophylaxis
    Levy, MJ
    Seelig, CB
    Robinson, NJ
    Ranney, JE
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1997, 42 (06) : 1255 - 1259
  • [26] Comparison of Omeprazole and Ranitidine for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis
    Michael J. Levy
    Charles B. Seelig
    Norman J. Robinson
    Jane E. Ranney
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 1997, 42 : 1255 - 1259
  • [27] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF EBROTIDINE COMPARED WITH RANITIDINE IN PATIENTS WITH DUODENAL-ULCER
    GABRYELEWICZ, A
    KONTUREK, SJ
    BUTRUK, E
    DZIENISZEWSKI, J
    MARLICZ, K
    NOWAK, A
    TORRES, J
    MARQUEZ, M
    ORTIZ, JA
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 1995, 7 (04) : 361 - 366
  • [28] PANTOPRAZOLE AND RANITIDINE IN THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE DUODENAL-ULCER - A MULTICENTER STUDY
    SCHEPP, W
    CLASSEN, M
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1995, 30 (06) : 511 - 514
  • [29] LONG-TERM CONSEQUENCES WITH REGARD TO CLINICAL OUTCOME AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF EPISODIC TREATMENT WITH OMEPRAZOLE OR RANITIDINE FOR HEALING OF DUODENAL-ULCER
    WALAN, A
    ERIKSSON, S
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1994, 29 : 91 - 97
  • [30] HEALING AND RELAPSE OF DUODENAL-ULCER DURING RANITIDINE THERAPY IN THE ELDERLY
    KOOP, H
    ARNOLD, R
    CLASSEN, M
    FISCHER, M
    GOEBELL, H
    BLUM, AL
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1992, 15 (04) : 291 - 295