A History of Psychology of Religion in the West: Implications for Theory and Method

被引:0
作者
Nelson, James M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Valparaiso Univ, Dept Psychol, Valparaiso, IN 46383 USA
关键词
Philosophy of science; Phenomenology; Hermeneutics; Naturalism;
D O I
10.1007/s11089-011-0407-y
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The study of religion in Western psychology has an interesting history that provides many lessons for future attempts to understand the spiritual aspects of human experience. In the past, psychologists have typically operated from one of three paradigms in their study of religion: (1) hermeneutic-phenomenological, (2) positivistic naturalism, and (3) religious integration. Each of these paradigms has a number of important theoretical assumptions and a preferred set of methodologies that offer significant advantages and disadvantages. The paradigm of positivistic naturalism, with its emphasis on quantitative questionnaire methodology, has been the most influential but also the least helpful in generating new ideas for the psychological understanding of religion, particularly as it is practiced in non-Western contexts. A historical survey of the other competing paradigms offers many insights and practical suggestions about how research in the psychology of religion might proceed in the twenty-first century.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 710
页数:26
相关论文
共 216 条
[1]  
Adams Jay E., 1970, COMPETENT TO COUNSEL
[2]  
Almeder R., 2007, INT STUDIES PHILOS S, V21, P171, DOI DOI 10.1080/02698590701498100
[3]  
Almond Philip C., 1984, R OTTO INTRO PHILOS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, PSYCHOL RELIG CLASSI
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1995, WHATS RES DISCOVERIN
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1935, LOGIC SCI DISCOVERY
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2005, ATTACHMENT EVOLUTION
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1950, REV INT PHILOS
[9]  
Armstrong D. M., 1997, WORLD STATES AFFAIRS, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511583308
[10]  
Armstrong DM., 1983, WHAT IS LAW NATURE