Strategies of Cooperation: Control and Commitment in Mega-Projects

被引:12
作者
van Marrewijk, Alfons [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Social Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
MANAGEMENT | 2005年 / 8卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.3917/mana.084.0089
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Public private partnerships are increasingly popular within infrastructure projects. Public administrations and private companies work together in order to successfully realize complex projects. One of the central themes of inter-organizational cooperation in projectbased alliances is the control-versus-commitment dilemma. The autonomy of a project organization and the authorization of partners are central in this dilemma, claim Child and Faulkner (1998). When dominant control is exercised by the project organization it involves risks of partners losing commitment to the project. Mega-projects involve a high degree of uncertainty, risk, and complexity; a mixture that is not ideal for hierarchical control (Clegg, Pitsis, Rura-Polley and Marooszeky, 2002). This paper explores how the dilemma of control versus commitment has been dealt with in the Environ Mega-Project.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 104
页数:16
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, ALLEMAAL ANDERSDENKE
[2]  
BATE P, 1994, STRATEGIES CULTURAL
[3]  
Bruijn J. A. de, 1996, GROTE PROJECTEN BESL
[4]  
Bruzelius Nils., 2003, MEGAPROJECTS RISK
[5]  
Child J., 1998, STRATEGIES COOPERATI
[6]   Governmentality matters: Designing an alliance culture of inter-organizational collaboration for managing projects [J].
Clegg, SR ;
Pitsis, TS ;
Rura-Polley, T ;
Marosszeky, M .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2002, 23 (03) :317-337
[7]  
de la Sierra M.C., 1995, MANAGING GLOBAL ALLI
[8]  
Faulkner D., 1995, INT STRATEGIC ALLIAN
[9]   Underestimating costs in public works projects - Error or lie? [J].
Flyvbjerg, B ;
Holm, MS ;
Buhl, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2002, 68 (03) :279-295
[10]   CONTROL AND PERFORMANCE OF INTERNATIONAL JOINT VENTURES [J].
GERINGER, JM ;
HEBERT, L .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 1989, 20 (02) :235-254