A symmetric LPM model for heuristic mean-semivariance analysis

被引:12
作者
Cumova, Denisa [1 ]
Nawrocki, David [2 ]
机构
[1] Berenberg Bank, D-20354 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Villanova Univ, Villanova Sch Business, Villanova, PA 19085 USA
关键词
Post-modern portfolio theory; Downside risk measures; Mean-LPM heuristic algorithm; Skewness preferences; Non-Gaussian distributions;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeconbus.2011.01.004
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
While the semivariance (lower partial moment degree 2) has been variously described as being more in line with investors' attitude towards risk, implementation in a forecasting portfolio management role has been hampered by computational problems. The original formulation by Markowitz (1959) requires a laborious iterative process because the cosemivariance matrix is endogenous and a closed form solution does not exist. There have been attempts at optimizing an exogenous asymmetric cosemivariance matrix. However, this approach does not always provide a positive semi-definite matrix for which a closed form solution exists. We provide a proof that converts the exogenous asymmetric matrix to a symmetric matrix for which a closed form solution does exist. This approach allows the mean-semivariance formulation to be solved using Markowitz's critical line algorithm. Empirical results compare the cosemivariance algorithm to the covariance algorithm which is currently the best optimization proxy for the cosemivariance. We also compare our formulation to Estrada's (2008) cosemivariance formulation. The results demonstrate that the cosemivariance algorithm is robust to a 45 security universe and is still effective at increasing portfolio skewness at a 150 security universe. There are four major benefits to a usable mean-semivariance formulation: (1) managers may engineer skewness into the portfolio without resorting to option strategies, (2) managers will be able to evaluate the skewness effect of option strategies within their portfolio, (3) a workable mean-semivariance algorithm leads to a workable n-degree lower partial moment (LPM) algorithms which provides managers access to a wider variety of investor utility functions including risk averse, risk neutral, and risk seeking utility functions, and (4) a workable LPM algorithm leads to a workable UPM/LPM (upper partial moment/lower partial moment) algorithm. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 236
页数:20
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Downside risk [J].
Ang, Andrew ;
Chen, Joseph ;
Xing, Yuhang .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2006, 19 (04) :1191-1239
[2]   E, SL PORTFOLIO SELECTION MODEL [J].
ANG, JS .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 1975, 10 (05) :849-857
[3]   COMPOSITE MEASURES FOR THE EVALUATION OF INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE [J].
ANG, JS ;
CHUA, JH .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 1979, 14 (02) :361-384
[4]  
BALLESTERO E, 2005, APPL MATH FINANCE, V12, P1
[5]  
Bawa V. S., 1975, J FINANC ECON, V2, P95, DOI DOI 10.1016/0304-405X(75)90025-2
[6]   CAPITAL-MARKET EQUILIBRIUM IN A MEAN-LOWER PARTIAL MOMENT FRAMEWORK [J].
BAWA, VS ;
LINDENBERG, EB .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1977, 5 (02) :189-200
[7]  
De Athayde G., 2001, MANAGING DOWNSIDE RI
[8]  
Efron B., 1993, INTRO BOOTSTRAP
[9]   SIMPLE CRITERIA FOR OPTIMAL PORTFOLIO SELECTION [J].
ELTON, EJ ;
GRUBER, MJ ;
PADBERG, MW .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1976, 31 (05) :1341-1357
[10]  
Estrada J., 2008, J APPL FINANCE, V18, P57