PATIENT COMPLIANCE IN MOBILE SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY

被引:20
|
作者
PISANO, ED [1 ]
YANKASKAS, BC [1 ]
GHATE, SV [1 ]
PLANKEY, MW [1 ]
MORGAN, JT [1 ]
机构
[1] LINEBERGER COMPREHENS CANC CTR, CHAPEL HILL, NC USA
关键词
PATIENT COMPLIANCE; BREAST CANCER SCREENING; MAMMOGRAPHY; FOLLOW-UP BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/S1076-6332(05)80517-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. We assessed the follow-up behavior of women who had abnormal results of screening mammograms taken on a mobile van. Methods. A retrospective cohort study was conducted between 1988 and 1991 of all women served by a mobile mammography van in rural North Carolina. Compliance with radiologist recommendations for followup was assessed through review of patient records and mail surveys of patients with incomplete records. Results. Compliance was 44% for negative or benign mammograms, 57% for indeterminate mammograms, and 62% for probably malignant or malignant mammograms. Women who had a previous mammogram or had a malignant finding were more likely to comply with follow-up recommendations (p < .0001) than women with normal or benign results and no history of mammography. Compliers and noncompliers did not differ with respect to family history of breast cancer or personal history of breast discomfort. Conclusion. Compliance with recommendations in this setting was lower than expected. This may be because rural women using mobile van mammography have limited access to the resources needed for appropriate follow-up. Further research is needed to examine explanations for poor compliance in this setting.
引用
收藏
页码:1067 / 1072
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Breast cancer screening by palpation, ultrasound, and mammography
    Morikubo, H
    RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN BREAST ULTRASOUND, 2005, : 159 - 162
  • [42] Personalized Mammography Screening and Screening Adherence-A Simulation and Economic Evaluation
    Arnold, Matthias
    Quante, Anne S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 (07) : 799 - 808
  • [43] Cognitive motivations associated with screening mammography in Cyprus
    Tolma, EL
    Reininger, BM
    Ureda, J
    Evans, A
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2003, 36 (03) : 363 - 373
  • [44] Combined screening with mammography and ultrasound in a population-based screening program
    Buchberger, Wolfgang
    Geiger-Gritsch, Sabine
    Knapp, Rudolf
    Gautsch, Kurt
    Oberaigner, Willi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 101 : 24 - 29
  • [45] Patient satisfaction with screening mammography: Online vs off-line interpretation
    Wilson, TE
    Wallace, C
    Roubidoux, MA
    Sonnad, SS
    Crowe, DJ
    Helvie, MA
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1998, 5 (11) : 771 - 778
  • [46] Compliance with mammography screening in Israeli women: The impact of a pre-scheduled appointment and of the letter-style
    Ore, L
    Hagoel, L
    Shifroni, G
    Rennert, G
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 1997, 33 (02): : 103 - 111
  • [47] Socioeconomic and healthcare supply statistical determinants of compliance to mammography screening programs: A multilevel analysis in Calvados, France
    Pornet, Carole
    Dejardin, Olivier
    Morlais, Fabrice
    Bouvier, Veronique
    Launoy, Guy
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 34 (03) : 309 - 315
  • [48] German mammography screening program: adherence, characteristics of (non-)participants and utilization of non-screening mammography—a longitudinal analysis
    Miriam Heinig
    Wiebke Schäfer
    Ingo Langner
    Hajo Zeeb
    Ulrike Haug
    BMC Public Health, 23
  • [49] Geographic access to mammography facilities and frequency of mammography screening
    Jewett, Patricia I.
    Gangnon, Ronald E.
    Elkin, Elena
    Hampton, John M.
    Jacobs, Elizabeth A.
    Malecki, Kristen
    LaGro, James
    Newcomb, Polly A.
    Trentham-Dietz, Amy
    ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (02) : 65 - 71
  • [50] PATIENT COMPLIANCE WITH COLORECTAL-CANCER SCREENING IN GENERAL-PRACTICE
    MANT, D
    FULLER, A
    NORTHOVER, J
    ASTROP, P
    CHIVERS, A
    CROCKETT, A
    CLEMENTS, S
    LAWRENCE, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 1992, 42 (354): : 18 - 20