PATIENT COMPLIANCE IN MOBILE SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY

被引:20
|
作者
PISANO, ED [1 ]
YANKASKAS, BC [1 ]
GHATE, SV [1 ]
PLANKEY, MW [1 ]
MORGAN, JT [1 ]
机构
[1] LINEBERGER COMPREHENS CANC CTR, CHAPEL HILL, NC USA
关键词
PATIENT COMPLIANCE; BREAST CANCER SCREENING; MAMMOGRAPHY; FOLLOW-UP BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/S1076-6332(05)80517-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. We assessed the follow-up behavior of women who had abnormal results of screening mammograms taken on a mobile van. Methods. A retrospective cohort study was conducted between 1988 and 1991 of all women served by a mobile mammography van in rural North Carolina. Compliance with radiologist recommendations for followup was assessed through review of patient records and mail surveys of patients with incomplete records. Results. Compliance was 44% for negative or benign mammograms, 57% for indeterminate mammograms, and 62% for probably malignant or malignant mammograms. Women who had a previous mammogram or had a malignant finding were more likely to comply with follow-up recommendations (p < .0001) than women with normal or benign results and no history of mammography. Compliers and noncompliers did not differ with respect to family history of breast cancer or personal history of breast discomfort. Conclusion. Compliance with recommendations in this setting was lower than expected. This may be because rural women using mobile van mammography have limited access to the resources needed for appropriate follow-up. Further research is needed to examine explanations for poor compliance in this setting.
引用
收藏
页码:1067 / 1072
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Could mobile mammography reduce social and geographic inequalities in breast cancer screening participation?
    Guillaume, Elodie
    Launay, Ludivine
    Dejardin, Olivier
    Bouvier, Veronique
    Guittet, Lydia
    Dean, Pauline
    Notari, Annick
    De Mil, Remy
    Launoy, Guy
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 100 : 84 - 88
  • [32] MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING CONTROVERSIES
    MILLER, AB
    CANCER DETECTION AND PREVENTION, 1994, 18 (04): : 305 - 311
  • [33] Mammography screening in Germany
    Diekmann, S.
    Diekmann, F.
    RADIOLOGE, 2008, 48 (01): : 17 - 25
  • [34] ‘Weighing in’ on screening mammography
    David Berz
    William Sikov
    Gerald Colvin
    Sherry Weitzen
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2009, 114
  • [35] The Benefits of Screening Mammography
    De Jesus, Charles
    Moseley, Tanya W.
    Diaz, Valentina
    Vishwanath, Varnita
    Jean, Shanen
    Elhatw, Ahmed
    Dalla Pria, Hanna R. Ferreira
    Chung, Hannah L. L.
    Guirguis, Mary S.
    Patel, Miral M.
    CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS, 2023, 15 (02) : 103 - 107
  • [36] Are there downsides to mammography screening?
    Baines, CJ
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2005, 11 (02): : S7 - S10
  • [37] Beliefs and mammography screening
    Cole, SR
    Bryant, CA
    McDermott, RJ
    Sorrell, C
    Flynn, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1997, 13 (06) : 439 - 443
  • [38] 'Weighing in' on screening mammography
    Berz, David
    Sikov, William
    Colvin, Gerald
    Weitzen, Sherry
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2009, 114 (03) : 569 - 574
  • [39] The Benefits of Screening Mammography
    Charles De Jesus
    Tanya W. Moseley
    Valentina Diaz
    Varnita Vishwanath
    Shanen Jean
    Ahmed Elhatw
    Hanna R. Ferreira Dalla Pria
    Hannah L. Chung
    Mary S. Guirguis
    Miral M. Patel
    Current Breast Cancer Reports, 2023, 15 : 103 - 107
  • [40] CAD in screening mammography
    Gur, David
    Sumkin, Jules H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 187 (06) : 1474 - 1474