APPROPRIATENESS MEASUREMENT WITH POLYCHOTOMOUS ITEM RESPONSE MODELS AND STANDARDIZED INDEXES

[1] BIRNBAUM A, 1968, STATISTICAL THEORIES

[2] BOCK RD, 1972, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V37, P29

[3] CHOICE OF TEST MODEL FOR APPROPRIATENESS MEASUREMENT [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1982, 6 (03) : 297 - 308

[4] Hulin C. L., 1983, ITEM RESPONSE THEORY

[5] JONES DH, 1982, 8241 ED TEST SERV RE

[6] LEVINE M, 1985, 1982 P IT RESP THEOR

[7] Levine M.V., 1979, J EDUC BEHAV STAT, V4, P269, DOI [10.3102/10769986004004269, DOI 10.2307/1164595, DOI 10.3102/10769986004004269]

[8] THE RELATION BETWEEN INCORRECT OPTION CHOICE AND ESTIMATED ABILITY [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1983, 43 (03) : 675 - 685

[9] APPROPRIATENESS MEASUREMENT - REVIEW, CRITIQUE AND VALIDATING STUDIES [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 35 (MAY) : 42 - 56

[10] LEVINE MV, 1983, NEW HORIZONS TESTING

[1] BIRNBAUM A, 1968, STATISTICAL THEORIES

[2] BOCK RD, 1972, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V37, P29

[3] CHOICE OF TEST MODEL FOR APPROPRIATENESS MEASUREMENT [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1982, 6 (03) : 297 - 308

[4] Hulin C. L., 1983, ITEM RESPONSE THEORY

[5] JONES DH, 1982, 8241 ED TEST SERV RE

[6] LEVINE M, 1985, 1982 P IT RESP THEOR

[7] Levine M.V., 1979, J EDUC BEHAV STAT, V4, P269, DOI [10.3102/10769986004004269, DOI 10.2307/1164595, DOI 10.3102/10769986004004269]

[8] THE RELATION BETWEEN INCORRECT OPTION CHOICE AND ESTIMATED ABILITY [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1983, 43 (03) : 675 - 685

[9] APPROPRIATENESS MEASUREMENT - REVIEW, CRITIQUE AND VALIDATING STUDIES [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 35 (MAY) : 42 - 56

[10] LEVINE MV, 1983, NEW HORIZONS TESTING