IN-VITRO DISSOLUTION VERSUS IN-VIVO EVALUATION OF 4 DIFFERENT ASPIRIN PRODUCTS

被引:6
|
作者
GORDON, MS
ELLIS, DJ
MOLONY, B
SHAH, J
TEITELBAUM, P
机构
[1] Syntex Research Syntex (U.S.A.) Inc., Palo Alto, CA, 94304
关键词
D O I
10.3109/03639049409038388
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
The single dose pharmacokinetic characteristics of four aspirin formulations in humans were compared with their in vitro dissolution properties. The pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by measuring salicylate concentrations in the plasma. Dissolution was measured by using the USP XX single time point dissolution test. The four aspirin products were a commercial tablet, a commercial capsule, a capsule filled with a commercial granulation, and a slow dissolving capsule formulation that failed the USP dissolution specification. It was found that there was a poor correlation between the in vitro dissolution results and the in vivo computed pharmacokinetic parameter statistics. In vivo testing in humans showed that all of the formulations were bioequivalent in terms of half-life and AUC, and the capsule that failed to pass the dissolution specification was bioequivalent to two of the three products that did pass the specification with respect to the maximum plasma concentration. None of the products could be demonstrated to be bioequivalent with regard to the time to maximum plasma concentration. However, none of the in vivo differences between the four aspirin formulations were judged to be clinically significant. Therefore, while there was a poor relationship between the in vitro USP XX dissolution test results and the bioequivalence test results, from a practical viewpoint the dissolution test is a satisfactory manufacturing quality control test, since it can detect differences in in vitro dissolution prior to their having a significant clinical impact.
引用
收藏
页码:1711 / 1723
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of in-vitro dissolution and in-vivo absorption for two different film-coated pellets of clarithromycin
    Zhang, XR
    Chen, XY
    Hu, LD
    Tang, X
    Li, SM
    Zhong, DF
    ARCHIVES OF PHARMACAL RESEARCH, 2005, 28 (08) : 977 - 982
  • [2] IN-VITRO VERSUS IN-VIVO LYSINE DEGRADATION
    CROSBY, LO
    WANG, S
    NESHEIM, MC
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 1972, 51 (05) : 1798 - &
  • [3] COMPARISON OF DISSOLUTION RATES OF DIFFERENT CRYSTALLINE PHASES OF FLUPREDNISOLONE BY IN-VITRO AND IN-VIVO METHODS
    HALEBLIAN, JK
    KODA, RT
    BILES, JA
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 1971, 60 (10) : 1488 - +
  • [4] DETERMINATION OF THE MECHANICAL IMPACT FORCE IN THE IN-VITRO DISSOLUTION TEST AND EVALUATION OF THE CORRELATION BETWEEN IN-VIVO AND IN-VITRO RELEASE
    AOKI, S
    ANDO, H
    TATSUISHI, K
    UESUGI, K
    OZAWA, H
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 1993, 95 (1-3) : 67 - 75
  • [5] BIOEQUIVALENCY EVALUATION BY COMPARISON OF IN-VITRO DISSOLUTION AND IN-VIVO ABSORPTION USING REFERENCE EQUATIONS
    KAYALI, A
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DRUG METABOLISM AND PHARMACOKINETICS, 1994, 19 (03) : 271 - 277
  • [6] RATE STUDIES ON IN-VITRO DISSOLUTION AND IN-VIVO ABSORPTION OF CHLORAMPHENICOL
    ANDERSGAARD, H
    FINHOLT, P
    GJERMUNDSEN, R
    HOYLAND, T
    ACTA PHARMACEUTICA SUECICA, 1971, 8 (04): : 403 - +
  • [7] IN-VIVO AND IN-VITRO CORROSION PRODUCTS OF DENTAL AMALGAMS
    OTANI, H
    JESSER, WA
    WILSDORF, HG
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1973, 7 (06): : 523 - &
  • [8] IN-VIVO AND IN-VITRO EVALUATION OF A BIOMACHINABLE GLASSCERAMIC
    RATHINAM, K
    SIVAKUMAR, R
    SARASWATI, V
    BULLETIN OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 1994, 17 (02) : 171 - 179
  • [9] IN-VITRO, IN-VIVO EVALUATION OF PHENFORMIN FORMULATIONS
    SIMMONS, DL
    LEGORE, AA
    KLAPKA, M
    JOSHI, NN
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 1973, 8 (04): : 139 - 141
  • [10] IN-VIVO AND IN-VITRO EVALUATION OF LIQUID ANTACIDS
    FORDTRAN, JS
    MORAWSKI, SG
    RICHARDSON, CT
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1973, 288 (18): : 923 - 928