EXECUTIVE SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE, RISK-TAKING AND LEVERAGE-NEUTRAL INCENTIVE SCHEME

被引:4
作者
Kaplanski, Guy [1 ]
Levy, Haim [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Bar Ilan Univ, Sch Business Adm, Fac Social Sci, IL-52900 Ramat Gan, Israel
[2] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
[3] Ctr Law & Business, Ramat Gan, Israel
关键词
Executive compensations; leverage-neutral bonus scheme; bonus cap; risk-taking;
D O I
10.1142/S2010495212500030
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In 23 out of 26 US industries, the annual CEO bonus is larger than the annual salary, suggesting that the bonus strongly affects the CEO's decisions. As the high leverage of financial institutions is often blamed for the 2008 financial crises, in this study we focus on leverage as a factor determining risk, particularly in financial institutions. The typical bonus scheme is not a leverage-neutral bonus scheme (LNBS), as the agent's optimal policy is to employ a corner solution: either zero or exteremely high leverage. Thus, consistent with Ross (2004), the bonus scheme does not neccesarily induce the agent to take greater risks. However, although more leverage is not prefered by all preferences, in most cases it is prefered. Thus, we suggest a combination of incentive parameters, which makes the agent indifferent to leverage, thereby preventing conflict beween the agent and the principal (stockholders).
引用
收藏
页数:45
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Acharya V, 2008, J FINANCIAL IN PRESS
[2]   On the optimality of resetting executive stock options [J].
Acharya, VV ;
John, K ;
Sundaram, RK .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 57 (01) :65-101
[3]   MANAGERIAL INCENTIVES AND CORPORATE-INVESTMENT AND FINANCING DECISIONS [J].
AGRAWAL, A ;
MANDELKER, GN .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1987, 42 (04) :823-837
[4]   Pay at the executive suite: How do US banks compensate their top management teams? [J].
Ang, J ;
Lauterbach, B ;
Schreiber, BZ .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2002, 26 (06) :1143-1163
[5]  
Ashenfelter O.C., 1999, HDB LABOR EC, P2485, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1573-4463(99)30024-9
[6]  
Baker GP, 1998, J FINANC, V63, P593
[7]  
Bebchuk LA, 2001, 8661 NBER
[8]  
Bebchuk LA, 2010, GEORGETOWN LAW J, V98, P247
[9]   Risk aversion or myopia? Choices in repeated gambles and retirement investments [J].
Benartzi, S ;
Thaler, RH .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1999, 45 (03) :364-381
[10]   MYOPIC LOSS AVERSION AND THE EQUITY PREMIUM PUZZLE [J].
BENARTZI, S ;
THALER, RH .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 110 (01) :73-92