Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection: Comparative Evaluation in Scenes with Diverse Complexity

被引:28
作者
Borghys, Dirk [1 ]
Kasen, Ingebjorg [2 ]
Achard, Veronique [3 ]
Perneel, Christiaan [4 ]
机构
[1] Royal Mil Acad, Dept CISS, B-2007 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Norwegian Def Res Estab FFI, Land & Air Syst Div, N-2007 Kjeller, Norway
[3] Theoret & Appl Opt Dept, French Aerosp Lab ONERA, F-31055 Toulouse 4, France
[4] Royal Mil Acad, Dept Math, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1155/2012/162106
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Anomaly detection (AD) in hyperspectral data has received a lot of attention for various applications. The aim of anomaly detection is to detect pixels in the hyperspectral data cube whose spectra differ significantly from the background spectra. Many anomaly detectors have been proposed in the literature. They differ in the way the background is characterized and in the method used for determining the difference between the current pixel and the background. The most well-known anomaly detector is the RX detector that calculates the Mahalanobis distance between the pixel under test (PUT) and the background. Global RX characterizes the background of the complete scene by a single multivariate normal probability density function. In many cases, this model is not appropriate for describing the background. For that reason a variety of other anomaly detection methods have been developed. This paper examines three classes of anomaly detectors: subspace methods, local methods, and segmentation-based methods. Representative examples of each class are chosen and applied on a set of hyperspectral data with diverse complexity. The results are evaluated and compared.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   A New Algorithm for Robust Estimation of the Signal Subspace in Hyperspectral Images in the Presence of Rare Signal Components [J].
Acito, N. ;
Diani, M. ;
Corsini, G. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2009, 47 (11) :3844-3856
[2]   Hyperspectral Signal Subspace Identification in the Presence of Rare Signal Components [J].
Acito, Nicola ;
Diani, Marco ;
Corsini, Giovanni .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 48 (04) :1940-1954
[3]  
Adler-Golden S. M., P 11 JPL AIRB EARTH, P3
[4]  
Ashton E. A., P SPIE ALG TECHN MUL, V6966
[5]   Hyperspectral subspace identification [J].
Bioucas-Dias, Jose M. ;
Nascimento, Jose M. P. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2008, 46 (08) :2435-2445
[6]  
Blumberg D., P 3 GRSS ISPRS S TEM
[7]  
Borghys D., P 29 S EUR ASS REM S
[8]  
Borghys D., P SPIE ALG TECHN MUL, V8390
[9]   Improved covariance matrices for point target detection in hyperspectral data [J].
Caefer, Charlene E. ;
Silverman, Jerry ;
Orthal, Oded ;
Antonelli, Dani ;
Sharoni, Yaron ;
Rotman, Stanley R. .
OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 47 (07)
[10]   Anomaly detection and classification for hyperspectral imagery [J].
Chang, CI ;
Chiang, SS .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2002, 40 (06) :1314-1325