ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK FOR MINIMIZING FREEWAY-INCIDENT RESPONSE-TIME

被引:23
|
作者
ZOGRAFOS, KG
NATHANAIL, T
MICHALOPOULOS, P
机构
[1] Nat. Tech. Univ. of Athens, Dept. of Transport Ping. and Engrg., Athens
[2] Calif. Dept. of Transp, San Diego, CA
[3] Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1993)119:4(535)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Freeway-incident-management (FIM) programs are receiving growing attention, since they have the potential of generating substantial savings for highway users. The goal of any incident-management program is the minimization of incident delay through the rapid restoration of the freeway capacity. The most important aspect of freeway-incident management is the servicing and the removal of the incidents. Currently a number of FIM programs use a fleet of trucks for the quick restoration of freeway capacity. Although the deployment of these traffic-flow restoration units (TFRUs) is an important component of freeway-management operations, the literature lacks analytical models that can be used to rationalize the deployment of the TFRUs. The present paper proposes an integrated methodological framework for the minimization of freeway-incident delays through the optimum deployment of TFRUs. The proposed model consists of three basic modules. The first module determines the number of required TFRUs and their service territories. The second module simulates the generation of freeway incidents and the traffic-flow restoration operations to estimate the total incident clearance time for each incident. Finally, the third module estimates the freeway-incident delay based on the total incident clearance time and the geometric and traffic characteristics of the freeway under study. The proposed model can be used to determine the number of TFRUs, and their dispatch policy, to achieve a threshold value of freeway-incident delay.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 549
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Improved response-time analysis calculations
    Sjödin, M
    Hansson, H
    19TH IEEE REAL-TIME SYSTEMS SYMPOSIUM, PROCEEDINGS, 1998, : 399 - 408
  • [42] VERBAL-LEARNING AND RESPONSE-TIME
    EISDORFER, C
    AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1964, 19 (07) : 514 - 514
  • [43] RESPONSE-TIME CONSTANTS IN SNAIL NEURONS
    HAYNES, LW
    KERKUT, GA
    EXPERIENTIA, 1977, 33 (11): : 1482 - 1483
  • [44] Response-time guarantees in ATM networks
    Ermedahl, A
    Hansson, H
    Sjodin, M
    18TH IEEE REAL-TIME SYSTEMS SYMPOSIUM, PROCEEDINGS, 1997, : 274 - 284
  • [45] LED DISPLAYS SPEED RESPONSE-TIME
    不详
    DESIGN NEWS, 1980, 36 (03) : 44 - 45
  • [46] RESPONSE-TIME IN MONKEYS WITH UNILATERAL NEGLECT
    VALENSTEIN, E
    WATSON, RT
    VANDENABELL, T
    CARTER, R
    HEILMAN, KM
    ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1987, 44 (05) : 517 - 520
  • [47] THE EFFECT OF REPEATED RESPONSES ON RESPONSE-TIME
    WILLINGHAM, DB
    PRENDERGAST, BJ
    BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1992, 30 (06) : 454 - 454
  • [48] A simulation metamodel for response-time planning
    Watson, EF
    Chawda, PP
    McCarthy, B
    Drevna, MJ
    Sadowski, RP
    DECISION SCIENCES, 1998, 29 (01) : 217 - 241
  • [49] CONSIDERATIONS IN PSYCHOMETRIC MODELING OF RESPONSE-TIME
    BLOXOM, B
    PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1985, 50 (04) : 383 - 397
  • [50] MEASUREMENT OF RESPONSE-TIME OF GAS ANALYZERS
    HUMPHREY, SJE
    WHITE, DC
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1989, 63 (02) : P227 - P227