ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK FOR MINIMIZING FREEWAY-INCIDENT RESPONSE-TIME

被引:23
|
作者
ZOGRAFOS, KG
NATHANAIL, T
MICHALOPOULOS, P
机构
[1] Nat. Tech. Univ. of Athens, Dept. of Transport Ping. and Engrg., Athens
[2] Calif. Dept. of Transp, San Diego, CA
[3] Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1993)119:4(535)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Freeway-incident-management (FIM) programs are receiving growing attention, since they have the potential of generating substantial savings for highway users. The goal of any incident-management program is the minimization of incident delay through the rapid restoration of the freeway capacity. The most important aspect of freeway-incident management is the servicing and the removal of the incidents. Currently a number of FIM programs use a fleet of trucks for the quick restoration of freeway capacity. Although the deployment of these traffic-flow restoration units (TFRUs) is an important component of freeway-management operations, the literature lacks analytical models that can be used to rationalize the deployment of the TFRUs. The present paper proposes an integrated methodological framework for the minimization of freeway-incident delays through the optimum deployment of TFRUs. The proposed model consists of three basic modules. The first module determines the number of required TFRUs and their service territories. The second module simulates the generation of freeway incidents and the traffic-flow restoration operations to estimate the total incident clearance time for each incident. Finally, the third module estimates the freeway-incident delay based on the total incident clearance time and the geometric and traffic characteristics of the freeway under study. The proposed model can be used to determine the number of TFRUs, and their dispatch policy, to achieve a threshold value of freeway-incident delay.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 549
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] RESPONSE-TIME AND TEST ANXIETY
    TOBIAS, S
    HEDL, JJ
    TOWLE, NJ
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1974, 34 (02) : 479 - 485
  • [22] RESPONSE-TIME OF SOLAR COLLECTORS
    WIJEYSUNDERA, NE
    SOLAR ENERGY, 1976, 18 (01) : 65 - 68
  • [23] WHAT IS A RESPONSE-TIME TEST
    BRIDGE, FR
    LIBRARY JOURNAL, 1992, 117 (12) : 52 - 53
  • [24] APPROXIMATING RESPONSE-TIME DISTRIBUTIONS
    RAATIKAINEN, KEE
    1989 ACM SIGMETRICS AND PERFORMANCE 89 : INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MEASUREMENT AND MODELING OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS: PROCEEDINGS, 1989, 17 : 190 - 199
  • [25] TIME-SERIES MODELS FOR FREEWAY INCIDENT DETECTION
    AHMED, SA
    COOK, AR
    TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING JOURNAL OF ASCE, 1980, 106 (06): : 731 - 745
  • [26] Predicting Freeway Travel Time Under Incident Conditions
    Xia, Jingxin
    Chen, Mei
    Qian, Zhendong
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2010, (2178) : 58 - 66
  • [27] Response-time of Pyroelectric Detector Simulator
    Klyuchnyk, Igor
    Bondarenko, Alexander
    Galkin, Pavlo
    Golovkina, Lydmila
    Khoroshaylo, Yuriy
    Shtanko, Valentina
    Kravets, Nikolay
    2021 XXXI INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM METROLOGY AND METROLOGY ASSURANCE (MMA 2021), 2021, : 48 - 52
  • [28] ON THE SELECTION OF A SYSTEM WITH LIMIT RESPONSE-TIME
    KOCHUBIEVSKII, ID
    DOKLADY AKADEMII NAUK SSSR, 1980, 250 (06): : 1341 - 1343
  • [29] RACE MODELS FOR RESPONSE-TIME DATA
    COLONIUS, H
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 27 (3-4) : 373 - 373
  • [30] Conceptual Issues in Response-Time Modeling
    van der Linden, Wim J.
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 2009, 46 (03) : 247 - 272