PUBLIC RESPONSES TO THE CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT

被引:69
作者
RENN, O
机构
[1] Center for Technology, Environment, and Development (CENTED), Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80125-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The reactor accident at Chernobyl caught many European nations by surprise since most risk management institutions were unprepared for an accident of the magnitude and transnational character of Chernobyl. Although confusion and contradictory advice from these institutions dominated the risk management efforts in the early aftermath of the disaster, the dose savings achieved by protective actions were roughly proportional to the magnitude of the nuclear threat. The accident itself and the policies adopted to cope with the fallout had a major effect on public opinion. This effect was the more dramatic and enduring, the more a country was affected by the fallout and the higher the percentage of indifferent positions toward nuclear power was prior to the accident. The media certainly intensified public concern, but did not distort the seriousness of the risk or create confusion about what protection actions were adequate. The major lesson from the disaster is to have a better risk management and communication program in place before a disaster strikes. © 1990 Academic Press Limited.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 167
页数:17
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
*ALL I DEM, 1987, PUBL OP POLL NUCL EN
[2]  
BELELLI U, 1988, URANIUM NUCLEAR ENER
[4]   ATTITUDES AND ATTITUDE-CHANGE [J].
CHAIKEN, S ;
STANGOR, C .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 38 :575-630
[5]  
Cotton J., 1985, SELECTIVE EXPOSURE C, P11
[6]  
Covello V., 1986, RISK ABSTR, V3, P171
[7]  
*EUR COMM, 1984, 26527 B EUR COMM
[8]  
Festinger L., 1957, THEORY COGNITIVE DIS
[9]  
Flavin C, 1987, FORUM APPLIED RES PU, P16
[10]  
Frey D., 1986, ADV EXPT SOCIAL PSYC, V19, P41, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60212-9