MIDAZOLAM FOR CONSCIOUS SEDATION DURING PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY PROCEDURES - SAFETY AND RECOVERY PARAMETERS

被引:0
|
作者
SIEVERS, TD
YEE, JD
FOLEY, ME
BLANDING, PJ
BERDE, CB
机构
[1] HARVARD UNIV,SCH MED,DANA FARBER CANC INST,DEPT PHARM,BOSTON,MA 02115
[2] HARVARD UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT ANAESTHESIA,BOSTON,MA 02115
[3] CHILDRENS HOSP,DEPT MED,BUFFALO,NY 14222
[4] CHILDRENS HOSP,DEPT ANESTHESIA,BUFFALO,NY 14222
[5] HARVARD UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT PEDIAT,BOSTON,MA 02115
关键词
MIDAZOLAM; PEDIATRIC; CANCER; SEDATION; PROCEDURES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Multiple bone marrow aspirations or biopsies and lumbar punctures are a necessary part of the diagnosis and treatment of many pediatric cancer patients. Pharmacologic sedation may decrease the distress associated with these procedures. Midazolam (MDZ, Versed) is a water-soluble, rapid-onset, short-duration benzodiazepine that has not been studied widely in children. We prospectively evaluated safety and recovery parameters for intravenous MDZ used for conscious sedation by oncologists (without an anesthesiologist in attendance) for 70 procedures (bone marrow aspirations, lumbar punctures, or bone marrow aspirations plus lumbar punctures) in 24 ambulatory pediatric cancer patients, aged 1.5 to 15.5 years. MDZ was used alone or in combination with morphine or fentanyl. Respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, blood pressure, and heart rate were monitored. Sedation, anxiolysis, and recovery were assessed with a behavior score and a modified recovery room discharge score. Restraint was not required in 45% of the procedures. In no case was a respiratory rate < 12 observed. In nine procedures (13%), an oxygen saturation less-than-or-equal-to 90 occurred, all within 10 minutes after the last dose of MDZ. Ten procedures (14%) required verbal stimulation to take deeper breaths. Two patients did not respond immediately to verbal stimulation and received face-mask oxygen. Hypoxemia was not correlated with opioid use. Hypoxemia appears to be related to total MDZ dose and may occur with normal respiratory rates; all cases resolved with verbal stimulation or face-mask oxygen without specific airway maneuvers or assisted ventilation. Heart rate and blood pressure remained stable in all 70 procedures. In all 70 procedures a satisfactory discharge score was achieved by 60 minutes after the last dose of MDZ. Full or partial amnesia was reported in 90% of the procedures. No long-term adverse effects were reported on follow-up. Midazolam appeared to offer effective sedation and amnesia in children undergoing bone marrow aspirations or lumbar punctures. Safe administration requires constant observation, use of pulse oximetry, and availability of supplemental oxygen and resuscitation equipment because significant hypoxemia can occur in patients breathing room air. A recovery period of 60 minutes appeared to be adequate.
引用
收藏
页码:1172 / 1179
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Oral midazolam for conscious sedation of children during minor procedures
    Davies, FC
    Waters, M
    JOURNAL OF ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1998, 15 (04): : 244 - 248
  • [2] Safety and efficacy of two protocols for sedation in pediatric oncology procedures
    Crea, Francesca
    Ruggiero, Antonio
    Genovese, Orazio
    Tortorolo, Luca
    Zorzi, Giulia
    Chiaretti, Antonio
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 3 (01): : 77 - 82
  • [3] Sedation using ketamine for pain procedures in Pediatric Oncology
    Ricard, C.
    Tichit, R.
    Troncin, R.
    Bernard, F.
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2009, 96 : S15 - S20
  • [4] Recovery of postural stability following conscious sedation with midazolam in the elderly
    Fujisawa T.
    Suzuki S.
    Tanaka K.
    Kamekura N.
    Fukushima K.
    Kemmotsu O.
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2002, 16 (3) : 198 - 202
  • [5] Safety of Propofol Sedation for Pediatric Outpatient Procedures
    Larsen, Reagan
    Galloway, David
    Wadera, Sheetal
    Kjar, Dean
    Hardy, David
    Mirkes, Curtis
    Wick, Lori
    Pohl, John F.
    CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 2009, 48 (08) : 819 - 823
  • [6] Midazolam administration at a department of pediatric radiology: Conscious sedation for diagnostic imaging studies
    Madzik, Jaroslaw
    Marcinski, Andrzej
    Brzewski, Michal
    Krzemien, Grazyna
    Jakubowska, Anna
    Roik, Danuta
    Majkowska, Zofia
    Biejat, Agnieszka
    POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 71 (03) : 93 - 96
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of EBUS-TBNA under conscious sedation with meperidine and midazolam
    Piro, Roberto
    Casalini, Eleonora
    Fontana, Matteo
    Galeone, Carla
    Ruggiero, Patrizia
    Taddei, Sofia
    Ghidoni, Giulia
    Patricelli, Giulia
    Facciolongo, Nicola
    THORACIC CANCER, 2022, 13 (04) : 533 - 538
  • [8] Conscious sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography:: midazolam or midazolam plus meperidine?
    Yuksel, Osman
    Parlak, Erkan
    Koklu, Seyfettin
    Ertugrul, Ibrahim
    Tunc, Bilge
    Sahin, Burhan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2007, 19 (11) : 1002 - 1006
  • [9] Propofol versus midazolam/ketamine for procedural sedation in pediatric oncology
    Gottschling, S
    Meyer, S
    Krenn, T
    Reinhard, H
    Lothschuetz, D
    Nunold, H
    Graf, N
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2005, 27 (09) : 471 - 476
  • [10] PROPOFOL VERSUS MIDAZOLAM FOR MONITORED SEDATION - A COMPARISON OF INTRAOPERATIVE AND RECOVERY PARAMETERS
    PRATILA, MG
    FISCHER, ME
    ALAGESAN, R
    ALAGESAN, R
    REINSEL, RA
    PRATILAS, D
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1993, 5 (04) : 268 - 274