Controlled Decontrolling: Involution and Democratisation in Dutch Rural Planning

被引:10
作者
Boonstra, Wiebren [1 ,2 ]
Van den Brink, Adri [3 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Rural Sociol Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Urban & Rural Dev, Ulls Vag 28 A-B, SE-75651 Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Wageningen Univ, Land Use Planning Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Rural planning; power; institutions; involution; The Netherlands;
D O I
10.1080/14649350701664721
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
The debate between proponents of collaborative planning theory and their critics on the dynamics of power in planning highlights a discrepancy between the norms and the practices of democratic planning. According to the norm of democratic planning, all participants should have an equal opportunity to influence and to realise a plan's objectives, but practice has shown that power is unequally divided between people, privileging some and excluding others. This raises the important issue of how normative aspirations of deliberative planning can be reconciled with actual planning practices. This article discusses this question, exploring the power relationships and institutional transformations that influence planning using two case studies about conflicts over Dutch rural land use.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 488
页数:16
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Alexander E.R, 2001, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V2, P311, DOI DOI 10.1080/14649350120096848
[2]  
Allen A., 1999, POWER FEMINIST THEOR
[3]  
Andela G., 2000, HEROISCHE JAREN RUIL
[4]  
Berger Peter L., 1966, SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION
[5]   Survey article: The coming of age of deliberative democracy [J].
Bohman, J .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY, 1998, 6 (04) :400-425
[6]   Network power in collaborative planning [J].
Booher, DE ;
Innes, JE .
JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2002, 21 (03) :221-236
[7]   Conflicts about water: A case study of contest and power in Dutch rural policy [J].
Boonstra, W ;
Frouws, J .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2005, 21 (03) :297-312
[8]  
Boonstra W.J., 2006, POLDER LIMITS CASE S
[9]   Policies in the polder: How institutions mediate between norms and practices of rural governance [J].
Boonstra, wiebren Johannes .
SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2006, 46 (04) :299-317
[10]  
Bouma J., 1961, RUILVERKAVELING KONI