How should firms deal with counterfeiting? A review of the success conditions of anti-counterfeiting strategies

被引:25
作者
Hoecht, Andreas [1 ]
Trott, Paul [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Portsmouth, Sch Business, Southsea, England
[2] Univ Portsmouth, Sch Business, Innovat management, Southsea, England
关键词
Counterfeiting; Strategies; Success conditions;
D O I
10.1108/IJOEM-02-2011-0014
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The production and sale of counterfeit products is big business in the international economy. Nowhere is this more evident than in China. This paper aims to review the anti-counterfeiting strategies that have been identified in the literature on counterfeiting. Design/methodology/approach - The paper takes the form of a literature review. Findings - This paper reviews 11 anti-counterfeiting strategies that have been suggested by relevant literature and has identified some of the success conditions. It also finds that firms should seek to take a longer-term view and to protect their technology-based competitive advantage. This is already happening: Japanese blue chip companies have begun to relocate sensitive R&D and high-tech manufacturing away from risky locations and back to Japan. Research limitations/implications - The paper shows that the dominant legal enforcement ( perspective) approach has been of limited success and explains the reasons for its failure. Practical implications - The paper concludes that anti-counterfeiting strategies should be seen as complementary rather than as mutually exclusive and that in the long run, as countries get more technologically advanced, governments will develop a strong self-interest in tackling the counterfeit problem themselves. Originality/value - The paper provides a systematic discussion of alternative anti-counterfeiting strategies that have been suggested by the literature and explores their success conditions in some detail.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 119
页数:22
相关论文
共 106 条
  • [1] Aaker D. A, 1991, MANAGING BRAND EQUIT
  • [2] ACG, 2007, ANT COUNT GROUP CAMP
  • [3] Albers-Miller ND, 1999, J CONSUM MARK, V16, P273, DOI 10.1108/07363769910271504
  • [4] Anderson J., 1999, INT CRIMINAL POLICE, V476-477, P56
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2011, COUNTERFEIT PRODUCTS
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2005, TIME
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2005, NY TIMES
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2002, TIMES
  • [9] Bale H., 1998, J INT ECON LAW, V1, P637, DOI DOI 10.1093/JIEL/1.4.637
  • [10] BAMOSSY G, 1985, ADV CONSUM RES, V12, P334