WORKPLACE INDUSTRIAL-RELATIONS UNDER DIFFERENT REGULATORY SYSTEMS - A SURVEY-BASED COMPARISON OF AUSTRALIA AND BRITAIN

The focus of the paper is upon the extent to which different national regulatory systems give rise to different institutions and outcomes at the workplace. It uses data from the Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey and the third British Workplace Industrial Relations Survey to examine a number of hypotheses which suggest that the different regulatory systems of these countries have produced distinct patterns of industrial relations at the workplace. It is concluded that, while there is substantial evidence that the countries' different regulatory systems have had distinct effect on industrial relations institutions and outcomes, these are not as straightforward as earlier work has suggested.