A REAL OPTIONS AND GAME-THEORETIC APPROACH TO CORPORATE-INVESTMENT STRATEGY UNDER COMPETITION

被引:93
作者
SMIT, HTJ [1 ]
ANKUM, LA [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV AMSTERDAM,AMSTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3665941
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
An investment strategy encompasses a sequence of tactical investment projects, of which several may yield a low return when considered in isolation. Often the value of such an investment consists of the option to invest in the future growth of the firm. For example, the value of a pilot project or an R&D investment does not derive so much from the expected cash inflows, but rather from the option to invest in future commercial exploitation. Standard forecasting of the expected cash inflows implicitly assumes investing in the follow-up project. Therefore, the traditional discounted cash flow (DCF) method has serious shortcomings in analyzing projects when information concerning future investment decisions is not yet known. The application of option theory can be used as an analytical tool to evaluate such projects and to support the overall operating and investment strategy. Brennan and Schwartz [1] examine the operational policy of a copper mine. Myers [9], Trigeorgis [12], McDonald and Siegel [8], Majd and Pindyck [10], and Myers and Majd [10] provide other examples of flexible investment strategies. We consider the option to defer investment in production facilities analogous to a call option on a dividend-paying stock. In this investment strategy, decisions involving the creation of capacity may be postponed so that management can decide not to invest if market demand turns out to be unfavorable. On the other hand, deferral also has disadvantages since during the postponement period the firm misses the net operating cash inflows. The analogy with a call option, of course, is not exact. One difference between financial call options and future investment possibilities is the exclusiveness of the latter. Kester [5] and Trigeorgis [ 12] have shown that competition in the market may force the company to invest early, which may erode the flexibility value of a deferred investment strategy. This paper casts the real options approach for project timing in a microeconomic framework. We use microeconomic tools to analyze aspects of competition in the investment strategy in forecasting the cash inflows. In this connection, we focus particularly on the concept of economic rents, i.e., the excess profit above the opportunity cost of capital. Economic rents attract new entrants to the market so that if the investment opportunity is not exclusive new entrants will diminish returns until expected and required returns are equal. Under rivalry, economic rents only exist if the firm has a specific competitive advantage in the realization of the project. The firm, therefore, needs to identify those markets in which it has a temporary or permanent competitive advantage and concentrate investment in these areas. If the competitive advantage is temporary, expected economic rents will decline over time and postponement will erode the value of the project. Based on the firm's strength in relation to its competitors and the value of the project in relation to market uncertainty, we develop various investment tactics. The paper is organized as follows. Section I discusses the options approach to investment timing. Section II studies the concept of economic rents for strategic planning purposes, as well as the influence of competition on the expected economic rents over time. In Section III, we use an options approach for timing investment strategy in different microeconomic market contexts. Finally, Section IV provides some concluding remarks and directions for further research.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 250
页数:10
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1985, RECENT ADV CORPORATE
[2]  
BRENNAN M, 1985, J BUSINESS APR, P135
[3]  
COX J, 1979, J FINANC ECON, P229
[4]  
HALL WK, 1980, HARVARD BUSINESS SEP, P75
[5]  
KEMNA AGZ, 1987, FINANCE INVESTMENT S, P107
[6]  
KESTER WC, 1984, HARVARD BUSINESS MAR, P153
[7]  
MAJD S, 1987, J FINANCIAL EC MAR, P7
[8]   THE VALUE OF WAITING TO INVEST [J].
MCDONALD, R ;
SIEGEL, D .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1986, 101 (04) :707-727
[9]  
MYERS SC, 1990, ADV FUTURES OPTIONS, P1
[10]  
MYERS SC, 1987, MIDLAND CORPORAT SPR, P6