QUIPS: Quality Improvement in Postoperative Pain Management

被引:15
作者
Meissner, Winfried [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Jena, Klin Anasthesiol & Intens Therapie, D-07740 Jena, Germany
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN | 2011年 / 105卷 / 05期
关键词
quality improvement; benchmarking; postoperative pain management; outcome quality;
D O I
10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.017
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Despite the availability of high-quality guidelines and advanced pain management techniques acute postoperative pain management is still far from being satisfactory. The QUIPS (Quality Improvement in Postoperative Pain Management) project aims to improve treatment quality by means of standardised data acquisition, analysis of quality and process indicators, and feedback and benchmarking. During a pilot phase funded by the German Ministry of Health (BMG), a total of 12,389 data sets were collected from six participating hospitals. Outcome improved in four of the six hospitals. Process indicators, such as routine pain documentation, were only poorly correlated with outcomes. To date, more than 130 German hospitals use QUIPS as a routine quality management tool. An EC-funded parallel project disseminates the concept internationally. QUIPS demonstrates that patient-reported outcomes in postoperative pain management can be benchmarked in routine clinical practice. Quality improvement initiatives should use outcome instead of structural and process parameters. The concept is transferable to other fields of medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 353
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] A patient-based national survey on postoperative pain management in France reveals significant achievements and persistent challenges
    Fletcher, Dominique
    Fermanian, Christophe
    Mardaye, Alain
    Aegerter, Philippe
    [J]. PAIN, 2008, 137 (02) : 441 - 451
  • [2] American pain society recommendations for improving the quality of acute and cancer pain management - American Pain Society Quality of Care Task Force
    Gordon, DB
    Dahl, JL
    Miaskowski, C
    McCarberg, B
    Todd, KH
    Paice, JA
    Lipman, AG
    Bookbinder, M
    Sanders, SH
    Turk, DC
    Carr, DB
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 165 (14) : 1574 - 1580
  • [3] Meissner W, 2007, ANASTH INTENSIVMED, V48, P690
  • [4] Benchmarking as a tool of continuous quality improvement in postoperative pain management
    Meissner, W
    Ullrich, K
    Zwacka, S
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 23 (02) : 142 - 148
  • [5] Quality Improvement in Postoperative Pain Management Results From the QUIPS Project
    Meissner, W.
    Mescha, S.
    Rothaug, J.
    Zwacka, S.
    Goettermann, A.
    Ulrich, K.
    Schleppers, A.
    [J]. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 105 (50): : 865 - U8
  • [6] Messerer B, ANASTHESIOL INTENSIV, V45, P592
  • [7] How can clinicians measure safety and quality in acute care?
    Pronovost, PJ
    Nolan, T
    Zeger, S
    Miller, M
    Rubin, H
    [J]. LANCET, 2004, 363 (9414) : 1061 - 1067
  • [8] Patient Registries: Utility, Validity and Inference
    Richesson, Rachel
    Vehik, Kendra
    [J]. RARE DISEASES EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 686 : 87 - 104
  • [9] The prevalence of postoperative pain in a sample of 1490 surgical inpatients
    Sommer, M.
    de Rijke, J. M.
    van Kleer, M.
    Kessels, A. G. H.
    Peters, M. L.
    Geurts, J. W. J. M.
    Gramke, H. -F.
    Marcus, M. A. E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2008, 25 (04) : 267 - 274
  • [10] A survey of acute pain services in Germany and a discussion of international survey data
    Stamer, UM
    Mpasios, N
    Stüber, F
    Maier, C
    [J]. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2002, 27 (02) : 125 - 131