Equality and differences: group interaction in mixed focus groups of users and professionals discussing power

被引:23
作者
Femdal, Ingrid [1 ,2 ]
Solbjor, Marit [2 ]
机构
[1] Ostfold Univ Coll, Dept Hlth & Social Work Studies, Halden, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Social Work & Hlth Sci, Trondheim, Norway
来源
SOCIETY HEALTH & VULNERABILITY | 2018年 / 9卷
关键词
Focus groups; interaction; heterogeneous focus group; mental health; community mental health service; vignettes; power;
D O I
10.1080/20021518.2018.1447193
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Using focus groups, the group interaction provide an important source of data about the group process. The aim of this study is to explore how users and professionals in mixed focus groups interact when discussing power in user-professional relationships. By analysing three mixed focus group discussions where both mental health service users and professionals participate, the article contributes to the discussion on focus group interaction in mixed focus groups. The analysis is inspired by Stevens' twelve-question guide for group interaction. The results show how the participants related to the vignettes, how they related to each other, and contradictions and disagreements in the focus groups discussing the vignettes. Despite the participant's background as users and professionals, the vignettes engaged the group discussions and became a tool for equality within the groups. By discussing power in user-professional relationships in mixed focus groups, the vignettes were interpreted from perspectives as user, mental health workers and researchers. Mixed focus group interaction can make a valuable contribution to developing knowledge in the field of mental health service research.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Allen J., 2011, LOST GEOGRAPHIES POW, V79
[2]  
Barbour R., 2018, DOING FOCUS GROUPS
[3]  
Barbour RS., 1999, DEV FOCUS GROUP RES, DOI [10.4135/9781849208857, DOI 10.4135/9781849208857]
[4]   Where to begin? Grappling with how to use participant interaction in focus group design [J].
Belzile, Jacqueline A. ;
Oeberg, Gunilla .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2012, 12 (04) :459-472
[5]   Lowering Cardiovascular Disease Risk for People with Severe Mental Illnesses in Primary Care: A Focus Group Study [J].
Burton, Alexandra ;
Osborn, David ;
Atkins, Lou ;
Michie, Susan ;
Gray, Ben ;
Stevenson, Fiona ;
Gilbert, Hazel ;
Walters, Kate .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08)
[6]   "We are All Fellow Human Beings": Mental Health Workers' Perspectives of Being in Relationships with Clients in Community-Based Mental Health Services [J].
Eriksen, Kristin Adnoy ;
Arman, Maria ;
Davidson, Larry ;
Sundfor, Bengt ;
Karlsson, Bengt .
ISSUES IN MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2013, 34 (12) :883-891
[7]   Dependence and resistance in community mental health careNegotiations of user participation between staff and users [J].
Femdal, I. ;
Knutsen, I. R. .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC AND MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2017, 24 (08) :600-609
[8]  
Forsyth D.R, 2013, GROUP DYNAMICS
[9]   THE SUBJECT AND POWER [J].
FOUCAULT, M .
CRITICAL INQUIRY, 1982, 8 (04) :777-795
[10]  
Foucault M., 2004, LECT COLL FRANC 1975