Effects of traditional Thai massage versus joint mobilization on substance P and pain perception in patients with non-specific low back pain

被引:37
作者
Mackawan, Surussawadi [1 ]
Eungpinichpong, Wichi [1 ]
Pantumethakul, Rungthip [1 ]
Chatchawan, Uraiwon [1 ]
Hunsawong, Tokamol [1 ]
Arayawichanon, Pricha [2 ]
机构
[1] Khon Kaen Univ, Fac Associated Med Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
[2] Khon Kaen Univ, Fac Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Khon Kaen, Thailand
关键词
Non-specific low back pain; Traditional Thai massage; Joint mobilization; Substance P;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbmt.2005.11.001
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Although both Traditional Thai Massage (TTM) and joint mobilization have been practiced in Thailand to reduce musculoskeletal pain, a comparative study of these in relieving pain is not been found in the literature. The purpose of this study was to examine the immediate effects of TTM versus joint mobilization on substance P and pain perception in patients with non-specific low back pain. Sixtyseven adults with non-specific low back pain were randomly assigned to receive either TTM (35 people) or joint mobilization (32 people). The duration of each treatment was 10 min. The levels of substance P in saliva and a visual analog scale (VAS) were measured before and 5 min after each treatment. Paired t-test was used to compare outcome variables at baseline with outcome measures 5 min after each treatment. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed to compare the difference between groups. Both groups showed a decrease in the level of substance P after treatment when compared with levels pre-treatment (73.86 +/- 62.31 pg/ml versus 50.43 +/- 64.39 pg/ml in TTM and 80.61 +/- 85.26 pg/ml versus 56.27 +/- 72.77 pg/ml in joint mobilization; p = 0: 019 and 0.006; 95% CI: 4.03-42.82 and 7.48-41.19, respectively). Additionally, there was a marked decrease in VAS after treatment in both groups (4.22 +/- 1.98 versus 2.45 +/- 1.75 in Thai massage and 4.35 +/- 1.71 versus 3.39 +/- 1.66 in joint mobilization; p = 0: 000 and 0.002, 95% CI: 1.12-2.40 and 0.37-1.55, respectively). There was no significant difference in the substance P level after treatment between the two groups. However, the VAS pain score was slightly different between the groups after treatment (0.88; 95% CI: 0.16-1.59;p = 0: 017), where the TTM group reported less pain than the joint mobilization group (2.48 +/- 0.25 versus 3.36 +/- 0.25 VAS, respectively). Both TTM and joint mobilization can relieve pain in patients with non-specific low back pain. However, TTM yields slightly more beneficial effects than joint mobilization. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 16
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Adam N., 1997, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY LOW, P39
[2]  
Anichini M, 1997, REV RHUM, V64, P18
[3]  
Appelgren A, 1998, J OROFAC PAIN, V12, P101
[4]   COST, CONTROVERSY, CRISIS - LOW-BACK-PAIN AND THE HEALTH OF THE PUBLIC [J].
DEYO, RA ;
CHERKIN, D ;
CONRAD, D ;
VOLINN, E .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1991, 12 :141-156
[5]   Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997 - Results of a follow-up national survey [J].
Eisenberg, DM ;
Davis, RB ;
Ettner, SL ;
Appel, S ;
Wilkey, S ;
van Rompay, M ;
Kessler, RC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (18) :1569-1575
[6]   Fibromyalgia pain and substance P decrease and sleep improves after massage therapy [J].
Field, T ;
Diego, M ;
Cullen, C ;
Hernandez-Reif, M ;
Sunshine, W ;
Douglas, S .
JCR-JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2002, 8 (02) :72-76
[7]   Acupuncture massage vs Swedish massage and individual exercises vs group exercises in low back pain sufferers - a randomised controlled clinical trial in a 2x2 factorial design [J].
Franke, A ;
Gebauer, S ;
Franke, K ;
Brockow, T .
FORSCHENDE KOMPLEMENTARMEDIZIN UND KLASSISCHE NATURHEILKUNDE, 2000, 7 (06) :286-293
[8]  
FRYMOYER JW, 1991, ORTHOP CLIN N AM, V22, P263
[9]  
Fulan A. D., 2001, SPINE, V26, pE155
[10]  
Kitti J., 2002, SRINAGARIND MED J, V17, P289