DELIVERY CHARACTERISTICS OF ALBUTEROL POWDER AEROSOL BY ROTAHALER

被引:14
作者
KIM, CS
GARCIA, L
机构
[1] Human Studies Division, Health Effects Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, NC 27711, Research Triangle Park
[2] Baker Cummins Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Miami
来源
JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE-DEPOSITION CLEARANCE AND EFFECTS IN THE LUNG | 1993年 / 6卷 / 03期
关键词
AEROSOL DEPOSITION; DRUG DELIVERY; DRY POWDER;
D O I
10.1089/jam.1993.6.199
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Delivery characteristics of Rotahaler (200 mug capsule of dry powder) were evaluated for a wide range of inspiratory flow rate. Specific drug doses discharged from Rotahaler and the doses subsequently delivered via an oropharyngeal model were determined by filter sampling and HPLC as a function of inspiratory flow rate. Size distribution of the aerosol was measured at the exit of the oropharyngeal model with a 7-stage cascade impactor. The impactor data were analyzed by both gravimetric and UV spectrophotometric methods. The results show that drug dose (mean +/- SD) discharged from the Rotahaler varied widely from 39+/-32 to 146+/-11 mug in the inspiratory flow range of 30-120 l/min. Of the dose discharged about 24-34% was lost in the oropharyngeal space in the flow range tested. The drug dose delivered via the oropharyngeal model was between 28+/-18 and 110+/-9 mug in the flow range tested: this value represented 15-58% of the unit capsule dose. The delivery dose was consistent only with inspiratory flow rates > 60 l/min. These results and a comparison with a pressurized metered-dose inhaler, Ventolin, are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 211
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
BRONSKY E., BUCHOLTZ G.A., BUSSE W.W., CHERVINSKY P., CONDEMI J., Et al., Comparison of inhaled albuterol powder and aerosol in asthma, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 79, pp. 741-747, (1987)
[2]  
COADY T.J., STEWART C.J., DAVIES H.J., Synchronization of bronchodilator release, Practitioner, 217, pp. 273-275, (1976)
[3]  
CHAN T.L., SCHRECK R.M., LIPPMANN M., Effects of laryngeal jet on particle deposition in the human trachea and upper bronchial airways, J Aerosol Sci., 11, pp. 447-459, (1980)
[4]  
DOLOVICH M., VANZIELEGHEM M., HIDINGER K.G., NEWHOUSE M.T., Influence of inspiratory flow rate on the response of terbutaline sulfate inhaled via the Turbuhaler, Am. Rev. Respir. Dis., 137, (1988)
[5]  
FUCHS N.A., The mechanics of aerosols, pp. 353-377, (1964)
[6]  
HETZEL M.R., CLARK T.J.H., Comparison of salbutamol Rotahaler with conventional pressurized aerosol, Clin. Allergy, 7, pp. 563-568, (1977)
[7]  
KIM C.S., TRUJILLO D., SACKNER M.A., Size aspects of metered-dose inhaler aerosols, Am Rev. Respir. Pis., 132, pp. 137-142, (1985)
[8]  
KIM C.S., ELDRIDGE M.A., SACKNER M.A., Oropharyngeal deposition and delivery aspects of metered-dose inhaler aerosols, Am. Rev. Respir. Pis., 135, pp. 157-164, (1987)
[9]  
KIM C.S., GARCIA L., WANNER A., Size distribution and delivery characteristics of four different metered-dose inhaler aerosols, Am. Rev. Respir. Pis, 139, (1989)
[10]  
KIM C.S., GARCIA L., WANNER A., Evaluation of oropharyngeal deposition of inhaled particles: a model approach, J. Aerosol Med., 4, (1991)