Treatment Options for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

被引:3
作者
Kelly, Brian J. [1 ]
Hughes, Thomas B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Allegheny Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Pittsburgh, PA 15212 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15237 USA
关键词
cubitsl tunnel; ulnar nerve compression; neurolysis;
D O I
10.1053/j.oto.2013.08.008
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Compression of the ulnar nerve can occur at multiple sites at the level of the elbow, and it is the second most common compressive neuropathy after carpal tunnel syndrome. At this time, the evidence does not suggest that there is a superior procedure for treatment of ulnar nerve decompression. It is largely dependent on surgeon preference and comfort level. In situ decompression is the simplest procedure, with the least disruption of the normal anatomy and similar results to the more extensive anterior transposition or medial epicondylectomy. The more recent use of endoscopic techniques may further minimize the postoperative recovery time and duration of pain symptoms beyond what is seen with in situ decompression. These procedures are commonly performed and well described in the literature, and the techniques for each procedure are summarized here. The authors suggest a surgical algorithm of in situ decompression as the primary option for ulnar nerve decompression with anterior transposition may best be reserved for revision cases refractory to in situ decompression or cases in which the ulnar nerve is found to subluxate anterior to the medial epicondyle when observed through a full range of motion after in situ decompression. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 242
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Endoscopic Release of the Cubital Tunnel
    Zajonc, Horst
    Momeni, Arash
    HAND CLINICS, 2014, 30 (01) : 55 - +
  • [22] Rates of Revision Surgery following In Situ Decompression versus Anterior Transposition for the Treatment of Idiopathic Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
    Van Nest, Duncan
    Ilyas, Asif M.
    JOURNAL OF HAND AND MICROSURGERY, 2020, 12 : S28 - S32
  • [23] Minimal Epicondylectomy Improves Neurologic Deficits in Moderate to Severe Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
    Kim, Kang Wook
    Lee, Hyuk Jin
    Rhee, Seung Hwan
    Baek, Goo Hyun
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2012, 470 (05) : 1405 - 1413
  • [24] Subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for failed decompression of cubital tunnel syndrome
    Caputo, AE
    Watson, HK
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 25A (03): : 544 - 551
  • [25] POSTTRAUMATIC ULNAR NEUROPATHY VERSUS NONTRAUMATIC CUBITAL TUNNEL-SYNDROME - CLINICAL-FEATURES AND RESPONSE TO SURGERY
    BARRIOS, C
    GANOZA, C
    DEPABLOS, J
    CANADELL, J
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 1991, 110 (1-2) : 44 - 48
  • [26] The management of failed cubital tunnel decompression
    Burahee, Abdus S.
    Sanders, Andrew D.
    Power, Dominic M.
    EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2021, 6 (09) : 735 - 742
  • [27] Paradox in the cubital tunnel syndrome-frequent involvement of left elbow: first report
    Kanat, Ayhan
    Balik, Mehmet Sabri
    Kirbas, Serkan
    Ozdemir, Bulent
    Koksal, Vaner
    Yazar, Ugur
    Kazdal, Hizir
    Kalaycioglu, Ahmet
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2014, 156 (01) : 165 - 168
  • [28] Effects of tendon transfer to restore index finger abduction for severe cubital tunnel syndrome
    Nobuta, Shingo
    Sato, Katsumi
    Kanazawa, Kenji
    Hatori, Masahito
    Itoi, Eiji
    UPSALA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 114 (02) : 95 - 99
  • [29] Gray-Scale and Power Doppler Ultrasound Findings Predictive of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome Severity
    Lee, Tony Y.
    Dy, Christopher J.
    Ray, Wilson Z.
    Colorado, Berdale S.
    Brogan, David M.
    HAND-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HAND SURGERY, 2024, 19 (03): : 392 - 399
  • [30] Risk factors predicting revision surgery after medial epicondylectomy for primary cubital tunnel syndrome
    Gaspar, Michael P.
    Jacoby, Sidney M.
    Osterman, A. Lee
    Kane, Patrick M.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2016, 25 (04) : 681 - 687