Comparative evaluation of the three different surface treatments - conventional, laser and Nano technology methods in enhancing the surface characteristics of commercially pure titanium discs and their effects on cell adhesion: An in vitro study

被引:13
作者
Vignesh [1 ]
Nayar, Sanjna [1 ]
Bhuminathan [1 ]
Mahadevan [1 ]
Santhosh, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sree Balaji Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Prosthodont, Madras, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Biocompatibility; cell attachment; cell culture; nano-particles dental implants; surface treatment; titanium;
D O I
10.4103/0975-7406.155817
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The surface area of the titanium dental implant materials can be increased by surface treatments without altering their shape and form, thereby increasing the biologic properties of the biomaterial. A good biomaterial helps in early cell adhesion and cell signaling. In this study, the commercially pure titanium surfaces were prepared to enable machined surfaces to form a control material and to be compared with sandblasted and acid-etched surfaces, laser treated surfaces and titanium dioxide (20 nm) Nano-particle coated surfaces. The surface elements were characterized. The biocompatibility was evaluated by cell culture in vitro using L929 fibroblasts. The results suggested that the titanium dioxide Nano-particle coated surfaces had good osteoconductivity and can be used as a potential method for coating the biomaterial.
引用
收藏
页码:S87 / S91
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Albrektsson T, 2004, INT J PROSTHODONT, V17, P536
[2]   FTIR study of a nanostructured aluminum nitride powder surface: Determination of the acidic/basic sites by CO, CO2 and acetic acid adsorptions [J].
Baraton, MI ;
Chen, X ;
Gonsalves, KE .
NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS, 1997, 8 (04) :435-445
[3]  
Branemark PJ, 1981, INT J ORAL SURG, V10, P387
[4]  
Brunette M. D, 2001, TITANIUM MED MAT SCI
[5]   A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants [J].
Cooper, LF .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2000, 84 (05) :522-534
[6]   Biologic determinants of bone formation for osseointegration: Clues for future clinical improvements [J].
Cooper, LF .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1998, 80 (04) :439-449
[7]   Scanning electron microscopical analysis of laser-treated titanium implant surfaces -: a comparative study [J].
Gaggl, A ;
Schultes, G ;
Müller, WD ;
Kärcher, H .
BIOMATERIALS, 2000, 21 (10) :1067-1073
[8]   Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants [J].
Goodacre, CJ ;
Kan, JYK ;
Rungcharassaeng, K .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1999, 81 (05) :537-552
[9]   A removal torque and histomorphometric study of commercially pure niobium and titanium implants in rabbit bone [J].
Johansson, C. B. ;
Albrektsson, T. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1991, 2 (01) :24-29
[10]   BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF TITANIUM IMPLANTS - SURFACE SCIENCE ASPECTS [J].
KASEMO, B .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1983, 49 (06) :832-837