Real options analysis of investment in carbon capture and sequestration technology

被引:68
作者
Heydari, Somayeh [1 ]
Ovenden, Nick [2 ]
Siddiqui, Afzal [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Stat Sci, London, England
[2] UCL, Dept Math, London, England
[3] Stockholm Univ KTH, Dept Comp & Syst Sci, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Real options analysis; CCS; Geometric Brownian motion; Mutually exclusive options;
D O I
10.1007/s10287-010-0124-5
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Amonga comprehensive scope of mitigationmeasures for climate change, CO2 capture and sequestration (CCS) plays a potentially significant role in industrialised countries. In this paper, we develop an analytical real options model that values the choice between two emissions-reduction technologies available to a coal-fired power plant. Specifically, the plant owner may decide to invest in either full CCS (FCCS) or partial CCS (PCCS) retrofits given uncertain electricity, CO2, and coal prices. We first assess the opportunity to upgrade to each technology independently by determining the option value of installing a CCS unit as a function of CO2 and fuel prices. Next, we value the option of investing in either FCCS or PCCS technology. If the volatilities of the prices are low enough, then the investment region is dichotomous, which implies that for a given fuel price, retrofitting to the FCCS (PCCS) technology is optimal if the CO2 price increases (decreases) sufficiently. The numerical examples provided in this paper using current market data suggest that neither retrofit is optimal immediately. Finally, we observe that the optimal stopping boundaries are highly sensitive to CO2 price volatility.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 138
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Valuation of Clean Technology Projects: An Application of Real Options Theory
    de Souza, Marcelo C. M.
    Fontes, Cristiano H. O.
    Vieira de Melo, Silvio A. B.
    Silva Junior, Antonio Francisco A.
    10TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PROCESS SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2009, 27 : 2079 - 2084
  • [42] Energy Technology Modelling of Major Carbon Abatement Options
    Kamel, Bennaceur
    Dolf, Gielen
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01): : 4297 - 4306
  • [43] Investment in carbon dioxide capture and storage combined with enhanced water recovery
    Li, Jia-Quan
    Yu, Bi-Ying
    Tang, Bao-Jun
    Hou, Yunbing
    Mi, Zhifu
    Shu, Yaqing
    Wei, Yi-Ming
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2020, 94 (94)
  • [44] Cost and US public policy for new coal power plants with carbon capture and sequestration
    Hamilton, Michael R.
    Herzog, Howard J.
    Parsons, John E.
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01): : 4487 - 4494
  • [45] The Economic Merits of Flexible Carbon Capture and Sequestration as a Compliance Strategy with the Clean Power Plan
    Craig, Michael T.
    Jaramillo, Paulina
    Zhai, Haibo
    Klima, Kelly
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 51 (03) : 1102 - 1109
  • [46] Near-term deployment of carbon capture and sequestration from biorefineries in the United States
    Sanchez, Daniel L.
    Johnson, Nils
    McCoy, Sean T.
    Turner, Peter A.
    Mach, Katharine J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (19) : 4875 - 4880
  • [47] Decision analysis of merchant transmission investment by perpetual options theory
    Salazar, Harold
    Liu, Chen-Ching
    Chu, Ron. F.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2007, 22 (03) : 1194 - 1201
  • [48] Carbon capture and storage as a corporate technology strategy challenge
    Bowen, Frances
    ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (05) : 2256 - 2264
  • [49] Carbon capture and storage: Fundamental thermodynamics and current technology
    Page, S. C.
    Williamson, A. G.
    Mason, I. G.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (09) : 3314 - 3324
  • [50] Real options analysis framework for agile projects
    Miller, Gloria J.
    2024 19TH CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, FEDCSIS 2024, 2024, : 429 - 441