GENDER FEATURES OF TIME ALLOCATION, GENDER STEREOTYPES AND LABOUR SUPPLY

被引:0
|
作者
Arnania-Kepuladze, Tamila [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Akaki Tsereteli State Univ, Kutaisi, Georgia
[2] Tomas Bata Univ Zlin, Zlin, Georgia
来源
EQUILIBRIUM-QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND ECONOMIC POLICY | 2011年 / 6卷 / 03期
关键词
gender; time allocation; labor supply;
D O I
10.12775/EQUIL2011.022
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Securing the well-being, protection of human rights and equality on the ground of age, gender, race, nationality etc along with sustainable economic development becomes the most important goal for any country. Gender differences in labor market are a problem of many countries. Being a larger demographic group, women have played a vital role in employment and economic development. Despite longstanding striving for gender equality, the inequality manifests itself in labor markets around the world. There is no common opinion on the reasons of the existence of gender differences in economic literature. After decades of research most investigators would agree that there can be no single-factor explanation for gender inequality in the labor market. One of the conventional explanations of gender gap in employment sphere includes the differences in men's and women's preferences in working hours due their stereotypical roles in the private and public life. This paper is focused on the study of gender feature of time allocation and its impact on the labor supply by men and women. For this purpose, based on the different types of activity, particular: income getting or income increasing promote activity, non-monetary income obtain activity, income-make activity, non-income-make activity, indirect-receipts activity, the author introduces the time allocation model which includes parameters such as working time, leisure, non-working time, using time, free time and time for satisfying an individual's physiological needs. For the attribution of different types of practice to certain kinds of activity the " principle of dominant purpose of activity" was offered. According to given time allocation model, the pattern of features of labor supply by men and women is offered in the paper.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 101
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Internet and the gender division of household labour
    Schwanen, Tim
    Kwan, Mei-Po
    Ren, Fang
    GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 180 (01) : 52 - 64
  • [32] THE ROLE OF GENDER IN RACIAL META-STEREOTYPES AND STEREOTYPES
    Babbitt, Laura G.
    Gaither, Sarah E.
    Toosi, Negin R.
    Sommers, Samuel R.
    SOCIAL COGNITION, 2018, 36 (05) : 589 - 601
  • [33] Drinking water and off-farm labour supply: between-gender and within-gender bias
    Zhou, Li
    Turvey, Calum G.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2018, 62 (01) : 103 - 120
  • [34] Gender and age differences in the internalization of gender stereotypes in early and mid adolescence
    Jose Villanueva-Blasco, Victor
    Grau-Alberola, Ester
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 17 (01) : 106 - 128
  • [35] Ambivalent sexism and the polarization of gender stereotypes
    Eckes, T
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIALPSYCHOLOGIE, 2001, 32 (04): : 235 - 247
  • [36] Women leaders in academia, gender and stereotypes
    Moncayo Orjuela, Bibiana
    Pinzon Lopez, Natalia del Pilar
    PANORAMA, 2013, 7 (13) : 75 - 94
  • [37] Gender, Race, and Speech Style Stereotypes
    Danielle Popp
    Roxanne A. Donovan
    Mary Crawford
    Kerry L. Marsh
    Melanie Peele
    Sex Roles, 2003, 48 : 317 - 325
  • [38] Gender Stereotypes in TCSOL Dialogue Corpus
    Li, Jiali
    Zhu, Shucheng
    Liu, Ying
    Liu, Pengyuan
    2022 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ASIAN LANGUAGE PROCESSING (IALP 2022), 2022, : 427 - 432
  • [39] Gender and Leadership: Student Perspectives on Gender Stereotypes in Round Square Schools
    Hassan, Kanwal Syeda
    Wright, Ewan
    ECNU REVIEW OF EDUCATION, 2023,
  • [40] Confidence and Gender: Few Differences, but Gender Stereotypes Impact Perceptions of Confidence
    Seitchik, Michael
    PSYCHOLOGIST-MANAGER JOURNAL, 2020, 23 (3-4) : 194 - 205