Evaluating the effect of e-government services on the citizens' quality of life: the case of Greece

被引:0
|
作者
Markaki, Ourania I. [1 ]
Charilas, Dimitris E. [2 ]
Charalabidis, Yannis [2 ]
Askounis, Dimitris [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Field E Govt, Heroon Polytechneiou 9, GR-15773 Athens, Greece
[2] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, GR-15773 Athens, Greece
关键词
e-government evaluation; sophistication stage; quality of life; fuzzy sets theory; fuzzy triangular numbers; Greece; e-government services;
D O I
10.1504/IJKL.2009.031512
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Governments around the world are embracing the digital revolution to enhance services for their citizens. However, the development of quality electronic services and delivery systems that are efficient and effective is only one way to improve the citizens' quality of life. The essence of e-government lies as well in engaging citizenry into the use of e-government services. As a result, this paper builds on the elementary concept of the time that citizens spend on their transactions with the public administration to provide: a an evaluation of e-government services in terms of the benefits that their use involves for citizens compared to the use of conventional ones b an evaluation of the actual utilisation of e-government services by the citizens. To overcome the impediment of subjectivity and uncertainty that is innate in the citizens' estimations regarding the time spent, fuzzy triangular numbers are adopted. The proposed framework is then applied for the case of Greece using actual data and a comparison with EU27+ is carried out so that useful conclusions can be drawn.
引用
收藏
页码:505 / 518
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Configuring e-Government services using ontologies
    Apostolou, D
    Stojanovic, L
    Lobo, TP
    Miró, JC
    Papadakis, A
    Challenges of Expanding Internet: E-Commerce, E-Business, and E-Government, 2005, 189 : 141 - 155
  • [22] Proactive and reactive e-government services recommendation
    Raouia Ayachi
    Imen Boukhris
    Sehl Mellouli
    Nahla Ben Amor
    Zied Elouedi
    Universal Access in the Information Society, 2016, 15 : 681 - 697
  • [23] A survey of acceptance of e-government services in the UK
    Adeshara, P
    Juric, R
    Kuljis, J
    Paul, R
    ITI 2004: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INTERFACES, 2004, : 415 - 420
  • [24] Drivers of citizens E- loyalty in E-government services: E-service quality mediated by E-trust based on moderation role by system anxiety
    Nawafleh, Sahem
    Khasawneh, Anis
    TRANSFORMING GOVERNMENT- PEOPLE PROCESS AND POLICY, 2024, 18 (02) : 217 - 240
  • [25] Proactive and reactive e-government services recommendation
    Ayachi, Raouia
    Boukhris, Imen
    Mellouli, Sehl
    Ben Amor, Nahla
    Elouedi, Zied
    UNIVERSAL ACCESS IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY, 2016, 15 (04) : 681 - 697
  • [26] E-government services: Certification and security overlay
    Arcieri, F
    Giaccio, R
    CERTIFICATION AND SECURITY IN E-SERVICES: FROM E-GOVERNMENT TO E-BUSINESS, 2003, 127 : 139 - 148
  • [27] Citizen Use of E-Government Services Websites: A Proposed E-Government Adoption Recommendation Model (EGARM)
    Mensah, Isaac Kofi
    Luo, Chuanyong
    Abu-Shanab, Emad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT RESEARCH, 2021, 17 (02) : 19 - 42
  • [28] E-government services evaluation from citizen satisfaction perspective A case of Afghanistan
    Anwer, Mohammad Anwer
    Esichaikul, Vatcharaporn
    Rehman, Mariam
    Anjum, Maria
    TRANSFORMING GOVERNMENT- PEOPLE PROCESS AND POLICY, 2016, 10 (01) : 139 - 167
  • [29] Generations X, Y, Z and their Perception of E-Government Services: Case of Turkey
    Ersoz, Selva
    Askeroglu, Emel Demir
    ONLINE JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 10 (01):
  • [30] An Extended Model of E-Government Adoption by Civil Servants in Greece
    Karavasilis, Ioannis
    Vrana, Vasiliki G.
    Zafiropoulos, Kostas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT RESEARCH, 2016, 12 (01) : 1 - 23