Percutaneous Hemodynamic Support (Impella) in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure and/or Cardiogenic Shock Not Eligible to PROTECT II Trial

被引:9
作者
Liu, Wei [2 ]
Mukku, Venkata Kishore [1 ]
Gilani, Syed [1 ]
Fujise, Ken [1 ]
Barbagelata, Alejandro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Med Branch, Div Cardiol, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[2] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Anzhen Hosp, Cardiol Dept, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
left ventricle assisting device; heart failure; percutaneous coronary intervention; cardiogenic shock;
D O I
10.1055/s-0033-1349167
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
PROTECT I and II trials have tested the efficacy of Impella in patents with high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, patients with severe hemodynamic instability such as cardiac arrest, ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI), or cardiogenic shock were excluded. The objective was to investigate the efficacy of Impella in sicker patient population who were not included in PROTECT trials. These patients merit high-risk PCI who had cardiogenic shock and unstable or decompensated heart failure (HF). From December 2010 to March 2012, 10 consecutive patients with extremely high surgical risk and hemodynamic instability underwent urgent PCI with Impella 2.5 support (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, MA). These patients were presented with advance HF and/or cardiogenic shock. Among the 10 included patients, 3 patients were with cardiac arrest and 1 patient was with acute myocardial infarction. All patients had successful Impella implantation and remained hemodynamically stable during high-risk PCI. Among the 10 patients 2 patients (20%) died within 1 month and 1 patient developed limb ischemia. In high-risk population nonrandomizable to PROTECT trials with advance HF/cardiogenic shock, Impella could be an important tool for hemodynamic support to PCI or could be a bridge to left ventricle assist device to achieve good recovery. Larger studies need to be conducted on this high-risk population.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 211
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Use of the Impella 2.5 for prophylactic circulatory support during elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
    Alasnag, Mirvat A.
    Gardi, Delair O.
    Elder, Mahir
    Kannam, Hari
    Ali, Farhan
    Petrina, Mircea
    Kheterpal, Vipin
    Hout, Mariah S.
    Schreiber, Theodore L.
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2011, 12 (05) : 299 - 303
  • [2] Feasibility and long-term safety of elective Impella-assisted high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a pilot two-centre study
    Burzotta, Francesco
    Paloscia, Leonardo
    Trani, Carlo
    Mascellanti, Marco
    Mongiardo, Rocco
    Materazzo, Guido
    Niccoli, Giampaolo
    Di Marco, Massimo
    Leone, Antonio Maria
    Porto, Italo
    Mazzari, Mario Attilio
    Rebuzzi, Antonio Giuseppe
    Schiavoni, Giovanni
    Crea, Filippo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2008, 9 (10) : 1004 - 1010
  • [3] Dens J, 2006, EuroIntervention, V2, P84
  • [4] A Prospective Feasibility Trial Investigating the Use of the Impel la 2.5 System in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (The PROTECT I Trial) Initial US Experience
    Dixon, Simon R.
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    Mauri, Laura
    Sjauw, Krischan
    Civitello, Andrew
    Kar, Biswajit
    Loyalka, Pranav
    Resnic, Frederic S.
    Teirstein, Paul
    Makkar, Raj
    Palacios, Igor F.
    Collins, Michael
    Moses, Jeffrey
    Benali, Karim
    O'Neill, William W.
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2009, 2 (02) : 91 - 96
  • [5] The Impella 2.5 and 5.0 devices for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients presenting with severe and profound cardiogenic shock: The Academic Medical Center intensive care unit experience
    Engstrom, Annemarie E.
    Cocchieri, Ricardo
    Driessen, Antoine H.
    Sjauw, Krischan D.
    Vis, Marije M.
    Baan, Jan
    de Jong, Mark
    Lagrand, Wim K.
    van der Sloot, Jos A. P.
    Tijssen, Jan G.
    de Winter, Robbert J.
    de Mol, Bas A. S.
    Piek, Jan J.
    Henriques, Jose P. J. M.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (09) : 2072 - 2079
  • [6] Combined Use of Impella Device and Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump to Improve Survival in a Patient in Profound Cardiogenic Shock Post Cardiac Arrest
    Gupta, Anjan
    Allaqaband, Suhail
    Bajwa, Tanvir
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2009, 74 (06) : 975 - 976
  • [7] Cardiogenic shock secondary to severe acute ischemic mitral regurgitation managed with an impella 2.5 percutaneous left ventricular assist device
    Harmon, Laura
    Boccalandro, Fernando
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2012, 79 (07) : 1129 - 1134
  • [8] Safety and feasibility of elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures with left ventricular support of the Impella Recover LP 2.5
    Henriques, JPS
    Remmelink, M
    Baan, J
    van der Schaaf, RJ
    Vis, MM
    Koch, KT
    Scholten, EW
    de Mol, BAJM
    Tijssen, JGP
    Piek, JJ
    de Winter, RJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 97 (07) : 990 - 992
  • [9] High-risk PCI in acute coronary syndromes with Impella LP 2.5 device support
    Iliodromitis, Konstantinos E.
    Kahlert, Philipp
    Plicht, Bjorn
    Hoffmann, Andreas-Claudius
    Eggebrecht, Holger
    Erbel, Raimund
    Konorza, Thomas F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 153 (01) : 59 - 63
  • [10] Jolly Neeraj, 2009, J Invasive Cardiol, V21, pE134