Cardiac Output Monitoring: Is There a Gold Standard and How Do the Newer Technologies Compare?

被引:65
作者
Pugsley, Jacob [1 ]
Lerner, Adam B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, 1 Deaconess Rd, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
monitoring; cardiac output measurement; gold standard; Fick; thermodilution; pulse contour analysis; TEE; NICO;
D O I
10.1177/1089253210386386
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
As a principal determinant of oxygen delivery and of blood pressure, cardiac output (CO) represents an important hemodynamic variable. Its accurate measurement, therefore, is important to the clinician caring for critically ill patients in a variety of care environments. Though the first clinical measurement of CO occurred 70 years ago, it was the introduction of the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) with thermodilution-based determination of CO in the 1970s that set the stage for practical and widespread clinical measurement of CO. Although the usefulness and accuracy of this technique have justified its consideration as a "practical" gold standard in CO measurement, its drawbacks have driven the search for newer, less invasive measurement techniques. The last decade has seen the introduction of several such devices into the clinical arena. This article will serve to give a brief review of the history of CO measurement, to provide a discussion of the measurement of accuracy as it relates to CO measurement, and to discuss some of the newer methods and devices for CO measurement and how they have fared against a "practical" gold standard.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 282
页数:9
相关论文
共 91 条
  • [1] Comparison of transesophageal echocardiographic, Fick, and thermodilution cardiac output in critically ill patients
    Axler, O
    Tousignant, C
    Thompson, CR
    DallavaSantucci, J
    Phang, PT
    Russell, JA
    Walley, KR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 1996, 11 (03) : 109 - 116
  • [2] Baylor Peter, 2006, J Intensive Care Med, V21, P93, DOI 10.1177/0885066605285234
  • [3] USE OF ISO-SHUNT LINES FOR CONTROL OF OXYGEN-THERAPY
    BENATAR, SR
    HEWLETT, AM
    NUNN, JF
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1973, 45 (07) : 711 - 718
  • [4] Transoesophageal echocardiography is unreliable for cardiac output assessment after cardiac surgery compared with thermodilution
    Bettex, DA
    Hinselmann, V
    Hellermann, JP
    Jenni, R
    Schmid, ER
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2004, 59 (12) : 1184 - 1192
  • [5] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [6] Measurement of cardiac output before and after cardiopulmonary bypass:: Comparison among aortic transit-time ultrasound, thermodilution, and noninvasive partial CO2 rebreathing
    Botero, M
    Kirby, D
    Lobato, EB
    Staples, ED
    Gravenstein, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2004, 18 (05) : 563 - 572
  • [7] Transoesophageal echo-Doppler vs. thermodilution cardiac output measurement during hepatic vascular exclusion in liver transplantation
    Boucaud, C.
    Bouffard, Y.
    Dumortier, J.
    Gaillac, N.
    Sagnard, P.
    Graber, M. C.
    Adham, M.
    Boillot, O.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2008, 25 (06) : 485 - 489
  • [8] Boyle Martin, 2007, Aust Crit Care, V20, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.aucc.2006.11.003
  • [9] Cardiac output measured by a new arterial pressure waveform analysis method without calibration compared with thermodilution after cardiac surgery
    Breukers, Rose-Marieke B. G. E.
    Sepehrkhouy, Shahrzad
    Spiegelenberg, Stefan R.
    Groeneveld, A. B. Johan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2007, 21 (05) : 632 - 635
  • [10] Buhre G, 1999, J CARDIOTHOR VASC AN, V13, P437