BUMBLE BEE LEARNING AND FLOWER MORPHOLOGY

被引:154
|
作者
LAVERTY, TM
机构
[1] Department of Zoology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON
关键词
D O I
10.1006/anbe.1994.1077
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The time required for naive bumble bees to learn flower handling skills was compared among nine plant species with flowers of varying morphological complexity. Learning was measured as the time to reach a criterion of 80% correct flower visits, and as the rate at which naive bees improved their flower handling efficiency relative to experienced bees. On shallow, cup-shaped flowers with exposed nectar and on most long-tubed flowers with an open entrance, all naive bees located the nectary on their first attempt. On these relatively simple flowers, naive bees reached the learning criterion after a few minutes and took 3-10 min to approach the handling efficiency of experienced bees. On more complex flowers, with nectar concealed in a closed tube or in an unusual location, 55-71% of bees failed to find the nectar on their first visits. Bees that did find concealed nectar took 5-30 min to reach the learning criterion and 20-60 min to approach the handling efficiency of experienced bees. In general, morphologically complex flower designs took bees longer to learn than open-tubed or cup-shaped designs. However, specific predictions about the relative difficulty of learning to handle flowers could not be made from general flower morphology. Variation among bees in reaching the learning criterion was associated with individual age and size, although much of the variation was unexplained. Previous experience with simple flowers of one plant species decreased subsequent learning on other species with simple flowers but not on species with complex flowers. © 1994 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 545
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Honey bee/bumble bee flower competition
    Reid, Steve
    AMERICAN BEE JOURNAL, 2007, 148 (09): : 746 - 746
  • [2] MORPHOLOGY AS A PREDICTOR OF FLOWER CHOICE BY BUMBLE BEES
    HARDER, LD
    ECOLOGY, 1985, 66 (01) : 198 - 210
  • [3] Transposition of flower height by bumble bee foragers (Bombus impatiens)
    Wiegmann D.D.
    Wiegmann D.A.
    MacNeal J.
    Gafford J.
    Animal Cognition, 2000, 3 (2) : 85 - 89
  • [4] The contribution of plant spatial arrangement to bumble bee flower constancy
    Bruninga-Socolar, Bethanne
    Winfree, Rachael
    Crone, Elizabeth E.
    OECOLOGIA, 2022, 198 (02) : 471 - 481
  • [5] The contribution of plant spatial arrangement to bumble bee flower constancy
    Bethanne Bruninga-Socolar
    Rachael Winfree
    Elizabeth E. Crone
    Oecologia, 2022, 198 : 471 - 481
  • [6] How bee learning might influence the evolution of a common flower morphology
    Burrow, Jenny
    Wilkins, Rachel
    Mayberry, Maggie
    Novinger, An-naliese
    Naumer, Katherine
    Muse, Haley
    McCart, Dalton
    Russell, Avery
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 64 : S69 - S69
  • [7] Subalpine Bumble Bee Foraging Distances and Densities in Relation to Flower Availability
    Elliott, Susan E.
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2009, 38 (03) : 748 - 756
  • [8] Differences in EAG Response and Behavioral Choices between Honey Bee and Bumble Bee to Tomato Flower Volatiles
    Liu, Jinjia
    Zhang, Jiangchao
    Shen, Jinshan
    Zhao, Huiting
    Ma, Weihua
    Jiang, Yusuo
    INSECTS, 2022, 13 (11)
  • [9] Flower strips enhance abundance of bumble bee queens and males in landscapes with few honey bee hives
    Bommarco, Riccardo
    Lindstrom, Sandra A. M.
    Raderschall, Chloe A.
    Gagic, Vesna
    Lundin, Ola
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2021, 263
  • [10] Microbes on the mind: effects on learning in a generalist bumble bee
    Russell, Avery
    Ashman, Tia-Lynn
    Campbell, Parker
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2023, 63 : S401 - S401