Academics' Professionalism and Quality Mechanisms: Challenges and Tensions

被引:20
作者
Cheng, Ming [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Brighton, Ctr Learning & Teaching, Brighton, E Sussex, England
关键词
academic professionalism; audit culture; quality mechanisms; tension; trust;
D O I
10.1080/13538320903343008
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper provides an insight into the debate about academic work as a profession. It refers to the sociology of professions and explores how academics in a pre-1992 university in England understood their work as a profession and how they interpreted their professionalism in the context of an audit culture for teaching. It reveals that academics' professionalism has affected their attitudes towards audit-related quality mechanisms and resulted in a perceived tension between professional values and the audit. This tension was caused by the perceived bureaucracy of the audit, its time cost and the perception that the audit is a symbol of distrust in the professionalism of academics.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 205
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[21]  
PIPER DW, 1994, ARE PROFESSORS PROFE
[22]  
Power M., 1997, AUDIT SOC RITUALS VE
[23]  
Power M., 1994, AUDIT EXPLOSION
[24]  
Roth G., 1968, M WEBER 1864 1920 EC
[25]  
Strauss A., 1990, QUAL SOCIOL
[26]  
TROW M, 1993, MANAGERIALISM ACAD P
[27]  
Walden G., 1996, WE SHOULD KNOW BETTE
[28]  
Watson T. J., 2003, SOCIOLOGY WORK IND
[29]  
Webb S., 1917, NEW STATESMAN, V9, P2
[30]  
Weber M, 1918, SCI VOCATION