What Is the Ideal Core Number for Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy?

被引:7
作者
Chambo, Renato Caretta [1 ]
Tsuji, Fabio Hissachi [1 ]
Lima, Flavio de Oliveira [2 ]
Yamamoto, Hamilto Akihissa [3 ]
Nobrega de Jesus, Carlos Marcio [3 ]
机构
[1] Sao Paulo State Univ, Botucatu Med Sch, Grad Base Surg Program, Rua Sete Setembro 860, BR-17502020 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Sao Paulo State Univ, Botucatu Med Sch, Hosp Clin, Dept Pathol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Sao Paulo State Univ, Botucatu Med Sch, Hosp Clin, Dept Urol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Needle biopsy; Prostate; Prostatic neoplasms;
D O I
10.4111/kju.2014.55.11.725
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We evaluated the utility of 10-, 12-, and 16-core prostate biopsies for detecting prostate cancer (PCa) and correlated the results with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, prostate volumes, Gleason scores, and detection rates of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP). Materials and Methods: A prospective controlled study was conducted in 354 consecutive patients with various indications for prostate biopsy. Sixteen-core biopsy specimens were obtained from 351 patients. The first 10-core biopsy specimens were obtained bilaterally from the base, middle third, apex, medial, and latero-lateral regions. Afterward, six additional punctures were performed bilaterally in the areas more lateral to the base, middle third, and apex regions, yielding a total of 16-core biopsy specimens. The detection rate of carcinoma in the initial 10-core specimens was compared with that in the 12-and 16-core specimens. Results: No significant differences in the cancer detection rate were found between the three biopsy protocols. PCa was found in 102 patients (29.06%) using the 10-core protocol, in 99 patients (28.21%) using the 12-core protocol, and in 107 patients (30.48%) using the 16-core protocol (p=0.798). The 10-, 12-, and 16-core protocols were compared with stratified PSA levels, stratified prostate volumes, Gleason scores, and detection rates of HGPIN and ASAP; no significant differences were found. Conclusions: Cancer positivity with the 10-core protocol was not significantly different from that with the 12-and 16-core protocols, which indicates that the 10-core protocol is acceptable for performing a first biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:725 / 731
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, INC CANC BRAS
[2]  
Ceylan Cavit, 2014, Can Urol Assoc J, V8, pE81, DOI 10.5489/cuaj.510
[3]  
Jesus Carlos Márcio Nóbrega de, 2006, Sao Paulo Med. J., V124, P198
[4]   The pathological interpretation and significance of prostate needle biopsy findings: Implications and current controversies [J].
Epstein, JI ;
Potter, SR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (02) :402-410
[5]  
Escudero BJF, 2008, ACTAS UROL ESP, V32, P713
[6]   Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate [J].
Eskew, LA ;
Bare, RL ;
McCullough, DL .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (01) :199-202
[7]   Program for Prostate Cancer Screening Using a Mobile Unit: Results From Brazil [J].
Faria, Eliney F. ;
Carvalhal, Gustavo F. ;
Vieira, Rene A. C. ;
Silva, Thiago B. ;
Mauad, Edmundo C. ;
Carvalho, Andre L. .
UROLOGY, 2010, 76 (05) :1052-1057
[8]   RANDOM SYSTEMATIC VERSUS DIRECTED ULTRASOUND GUIDED TRANS-RECTAL CORE BIOPSIES OF THE PROSTATE [J].
HODGE, KK ;
MCNEAL, JE ;
TERRIS, MK ;
STAMEY, TA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 142 (01) :71-75
[9]   Prostate cancer diagnosed after initial biopsy with atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for malignancy is similar to cancer found on initial biopsy [J].
Iczkowski, KA ;
Chen, HM ;
Yang, XMJ ;
Beach, RA .
UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (05) :851-854
[10]   Saturation technique does not improve cancer detection as an initial prostate biopsy strategy [J].
Jones, JS ;
Patel, A ;
Schoenfield, L ;
Rabets, JC ;
Zippe, CD ;
Magi-Galluzzi, C .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (02) :485-488