THE OPIOID-SPARING EFFECT OF DICLOFENAC SODIUM IN OUTPATIENT EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY (ESWL)

被引:21
作者
FREDMAN, B [1 ]
JEDEIKIN, R [1 ]
OLSFANGER, D [1 ]
ARONHEIM, M [1 ]
机构
[1] MEIR HOSP,DEPT ANESTHESIOL & INTENS CARE,IL-44281 KEFAR SAVA,ISRAEL
关键词
ANESTHESIA INTRAVENOUS; OUTPATIENT; DICLOFENAC SODIUM; EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; RENAL CALCULI;
D O I
10.1016/0952-8180(93)90142-2
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To evaluate the opioid-sparing and analgesic effect of diclofenac sodium in ambulatory nonimmersion extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Setting: Large referral hospital. Patients: Twenty-seven ASA physical status I and II patients with upper renal tract nephrolithiasis. Interventions: ESWL was performed with a sedative-analgesic technique. Diclofenac sodium 75 mg or an equal volume of saline was given intramuscularly 45 minutes prior to the procedure. Fentanyl and midazolam were added to maintain adequate sedation and analgesia. Measurements and Main Results: Demographically, both groups were comparable. In the diclofenac sodium group, heart rate was slightly higher, treatment time was shorter, more shock waves were administered (p < 0.02), and less fentanyl was required (p < 0.02). Mean arterial pressure was lower and arterial oxygen saturation by pulse oximeter was higher in the diclofenac sodium group. There were no differences between the groups in voltage, stone size, fragmentation, dose of midazolam administered, or overall assessment by both the doctors and patients. Conclusions: Patients administered diclofenac sodium received a greater number of shock waves, required less fentanyl, and showed a marginal improvement in hemodynamic stability and oxygenation during ambulatory nonimmersion ESWL.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 144
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Freilich, Brull, Schiff, Silverman, Houde, Schrier, Anesthesia for lithotripsy efficacy of monitored anesthesia care with alfentanil [Abstract], Anesthesia & Analgesia, 70, (1990)
  • [2] Monk, Boure, White, Comparison of two sedativeanalgesic techniques for lithotripsy under MAC: [Abstract], Anesthesiology, 73, (1990)
  • [3] Monk, Rater, White, Comparison of alfentanil and ketamine infusions in combination with midazolam for outpatient lithotripsy, Anesthesiology, 74, pp. 1023-1028, (1991)
  • [4] Malhotra, Long, Meister, Intercostal blocks with local infiltration anesthesia for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, Anesth Analg, 66, pp. 85-88, (1987)
  • [5] Kopacz, Mulroy, Chloroprocaine and lidocaine decrease hospital stay and admission rate after outpatient epidural anesthesia, Reg Anesth, 15, pp. 19-25, (1990)
  • [6] Bailey, Pace, Ashburn, Moll, East, Stanley, Frequent hypoxemia and apnea after sedation with midazolam and fentanyl, Anesthesiology, 73, pp. 826-830, (1990)
  • [7] Comparative study of the efficacy of dipyrone diclofenac sodium and pethidine in acute renal colic Collaborative Group of the Spanish Society of Clinical Pharmacology, Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 40, pp. 543-546, (1991)
  • [8] Lundstam, Leissner, Wahlander, Kral, Prostaglandin-synthetase inhibition with diclofenac sodium in treatment of renal colic: comparison with use of a narcotic analgesic, Lancet, 1, 8281, pp. 1096-1097, (1982)
  • [9] Pedronetto, Gorini, Mandelli, Fuccella, Double blind trial of new analgesic anti-inflammatory drug indoprofen in post-episiotomic pain, J Int Med Res, 3, pp. 16-20, (1975)
  • [10] Parsloe, Charter, Bembridge, Simpson, Premedication with piroxicam in patients having dental surgery under general anaesthesia with halothane or isoflurane, Br J Anaesth, 61, pp. 702-706, (1988)