A Randomized Controlled Trial on Very Early Speech and Language Therapy in Acute Stroke Patients with Aphasia

被引:54
|
作者
Laska, A. C. [1 ]
Kahan, T. [2 ]
Hellblom, A. [3 ]
Murray, V. [1 ]
von Arbin, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Danderyd Hosp, Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci, Div Internal Med, SE-18288 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Danderyd Hosp, Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci, Div Cardiovasc Med, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Danderyd Hosp, Dept Speech Pathol, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES EXTRA | 2011年 / 1卷 / 01期
关键词
Acute stroke; Aphasia; Language Enrichment Therapy; Speech and language therapy;
D O I
10.1159/000329835
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background: Aphasia affects one third of acute stroke patients. There is a considerable spontaneous recovery in aphasia, but impaired communication ability remains a great problem. Communication difficulties are an impediment to rehabilitation. Early treatment of the language deficits leading to increased communication ability would improve rehabilitation. The aim of this study is to elucidate the efficacy of very early speech and language therapy (SLT) in acute stroke patients with aphasia. Methods: A prospective, open, randomized, controlled trial was carried out with blinded endpoint evaluation of SLT, starting within 2 days of stroke onset and lasting for 21 days. 123 consecutive patients with acute, first-ever ischemic stroke and aphasia were randomized. The SLT treatment was Language Enrichment Therapy, and the aphasia tests used were the Norsk grunntest for afasi (NGA) and the Amsterdam-Nijmegen everyday language test (ANELT), both performed by speech pathologists, blinded for randomization. Results: The primary outcome, as measured by ANELT at day 21, was 1.3 in the actively treated patient group and 1.2 among controls. NGA led to similar results in both groups. Patients with a higher level of education (< 12 years) improved more on ANELT by day 21 than those with ! 12 years of education (3.4 vs. 1.0, respectively). In 34 patients in the treatment group and 19 in the control group improvement was >= 1 on ANELT (p < 0.05). There was no difference in the degree of aphasia at baseline except for fluency, which was higher in the group responding to treatment. Conclusions: Very early intensive SLT with the Language Enrichment Therapy program over 21 days had no effect on the degree of aphasia in unselected acute aphasic stroke patients. In aphasic patients with more fluency, SLT resulted in a significant improvement as compared to controls. A higher educational level of > 12 years was beneficial. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 74
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The impact of physical therapy intervention of dysphagia on preventing pneumonia in acute stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial
    Darwish, Moshera
    El-Tamawy, Mohammed S.
    Mahmoud, Aya
    Ali, Ahmed S.
    Khalifa, Heba A.
    PHYSIOTHERAPY RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 29 (03)
  • [22] A randomized, rater-blinded, parallel trial of intensive speech therapy in sub-acute post-stroke aphasia: the SP-I-R-IT study
    Martins, Isabel Pavao
    Leal, Gabriela
    Fonseca, Isabel
    Farrajota, Luisa
    Aguiar, Marta
    Fonseca, Jose
    Lauterbach, Martin
    Goncalves, Luis
    Carmo Cary, M.
    Ferreira, Joaquim J.
    Ferro, Jose M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2013, 48 (04) : 421 - 431
  • [23] Thrombolysis' benefits on early post-stroke language recovery in aphasia patients
    Menichelli, Alina
    Furlanis, Giovanni
    Sartori, Arianna
    Ridolfi, Mariana
    Naccarato, Marcello
    Caruso, Paola
    Pesavento, Valentina
    Manganotti, Paolo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 70 : 92 - 95
  • [24] Representation of people with aphasia in randomized controlled trials of acute stroke interventions
    Ali, Myzoon
    Bath, Philip M.
    Lyden, Patrick D.
    Bernhardt, J.
    Brady, Marian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2014, 9 (02) : 174 - 182
  • [25] An evaluation of treatment integrity in a randomized trial of behavioural therapy for low mood in stroke patients with aphasia
    Thomas, Shirley A.
    Russell, Claire
    Seed, Ruth
    Worthington, Esme
    Walker, Marion F.
    Macniven, Jamie A.
    Lincoln, Nadina B.
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2013, 27 (12) : 1097 - 1106
  • [26] Response to Speech and Language Therapy According to Artery Involvement and Lesion Location in Post-stroke Aphasia
    Aras, Berke
    Inal, Ozgu
    Kesikburun, Serdar
    Yasar, Evren
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2020, 29 (10)
  • [27] Effect of very early mobilisation on functional status in patients with acute stroke: a single-blind, randomized controlled trail
    Chippala, Purusotham
    Sharma, Raghava
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2016, 30 (07) : 669 - 675
  • [28] Differential Effects of Speech and Language Therapy and rTMS in Chronic Versus Subacute Post-stroke Aphasia: Results of the NORTHSTAR-CA Trial
    Zumbansen, Anna
    Kneifel, Heike
    Lazzouni, Latifa
    Ophey, Anja
    Black, Sandra E.
    Chen, Joyce L.
    Edwards, Dylan
    Funck, Thomas
    Hartmann, Alexander Erich
    Heiss, Wolf-Dieter
    Hildesheim, Franziska
    Lanthier, Sylvain
    Lesperance, Paul
    Mochizuki, George
    Paquette, Caroline
    Rochon, Elizabet
    Rubi-Fessen, Ilona
    Valles, Jennie
    Wortman-Jutt, Susan
    Thiel, Alexander
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2022, 36 (4-5) : 306 - 316
  • [29] Speech and language therapy for aphasia: parameters and outcomes
    Thomas, Lucie
    Lander, Louise
    Cox, Nicholas
    Romani, Cristina
    APHASIOLOGY, 2020, 34 (05) : 603 - 642
  • [30] Optimal timing of speech and language therapy for aphasia after stroke: more evidence needed
    Nouwens, Femke
    Visch-Brink, Evy G.
    Van de Sandt-Koenderman, Mieke M. E.
    Dippel, Diederik W. J.
    Koudstaal, Peter J.
    de Lau, Lonneke M. L.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2015, 15 (08) : 885 - 893