A Preliminary Report on Combined Penoscrotal and Perineal Approach for Placement of Penile Prosthesis with Corporal Fibrosis

被引:7
作者
Brusky, John P. [1 ]
Tran, Viet Q. [2 ]
Rieder, Jocelyn M. [2 ]
Aboseif, Sherif R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente, Bellflower Med Ctr, Dept Urol, 9400 East Rosecrans Ave, Bellflower, CA 90706 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90027 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1155/2008/524392
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose. This paper aims at describing the combined penoscrotal and perineal approach for placement of penile prosthesis in cases of severe corporal fibrosis and scarring. Materials and methods. Three patients with extensive corporal fibrosis underwent penile prosthesis placement via combined penoscrotal and perineal approach from 1997 to 2006. Follow-up ranged from 15 to 129 months. Results. All patients underwent successful implantation of semirigid penile prosthesis. There were no short-or long-term complications. Conclusions. Results on combined penoscrotal and perineal approach to penile prosthetic surgery in this preliminary series of patients suggest that it is a safe technique and increases the chance of successful outcome in the surgical management of severe corporal fibrosis. Copyright (C) 2008 John P. Brusky et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
引用
收藏
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] OPERATIVE APPROACH FOR SECONDARY PLACEMENT OF PENILE PROSTHESIS
    ODONNELL, PD
    UROLOGY, 1986, 28 (02) : 108 - 110
  • [32] DISTAL SHAFT RECONSTRUCTION FOR SEVERE CASES OF PENILE PROSTHESIS EXTRUSION OR CORPORAL FIBROSIS
    Egydio, P. H.
    Kuehhas, F.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2012, 9 : 350 - 351
  • [33] THE IMPACT OF SURGICAL APPROACH ON CORPORAL SIZING FOR INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS INSERTION
    Pagano, M. J.
    Weinberg, A. C.
    Hernandez, K. H.
    Valenzuela, R. J.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2016, 13 (05) : S28 - S29
  • [34] THE PENILE VERSUS THE PERINEAL APPROACH WITH THE SMALL-CARRION PROSTHESIS
    HARTY, JI
    AMIN, M
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1981, 126 (04) : 473 - 474
  • [35] TOTAL CORPORAL RECONSTRUCTION AND PENILE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE FIBROSIS AND ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION
    Sansalone, S.
    Garaffa, G.
    Leonardi, R.
    Vespasiani, G.
    Ieria, F. P.
    Loreto, C.
    Ralph, D.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2012, 9 : 329 - 329
  • [36] Streamlined Approach for Infrapubic Placement of an Inflatable Penile Prosthesis
    Karpman, Edward
    ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2012, 2012
  • [37] The infrapubic surgical approach for inflatable penile prosthesis placement
    Vollstedt, Annah
    Gross, Martin S.
    Antonini, Gabriele
    Perito, Paul E.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2017, 6 (04) : 620 - 627
  • [38] The clinical significance of imperfection: is idiopathic corporal asymmetry related to curvature during penile prosthesis placement?
    Bole, Raevti
    Alom, Manaf
    Habashy, Engy
    Ahmed, Mohammed
    Ziegelmann, Matthew
    Kohler, Tobias
    Helo, Sevann
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH, 2024, 36 (08) : 820 - 824
  • [39] Simultaneous placement of inflatable penile prosthesis and male sling through a single perineal incision
    Westney, O. Lenaine
    Romero, Claudio
    Wang, Run
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04) : 403 - 403
  • [40] Penoscrotal versus minimally invasive infrapubic approach for inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a single-center matched-pair analysis
    Grande, Pietro
    Antonini, Gabriele
    Cristini, Cristiano
    De Berardinis, Ettore
    Gatto, Antonio
    Di Lascio, Giovanni
    Lemma, Andrea
    Gentile, Giuseppe
    Di Pierro, Giovanni Battista
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (07) : 1167 - 1174