NONDETERMINISTIC NETWORKING METHODS

被引:45
作者
DIAZ, CF
HADIPRIONO, FC
机构
[1] Dept. of Civ. Engrg.,, Ohio State Univ.,, Columbus
[2] Dept. of Civ. Engrg.,, Ohio State Univ.,, Columbus, OH
来源
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE | 1993年 / 119卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1993)119:1(40)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Several probabilistic methods use risk analysis for construction networking. In this study, the writers compare and evaluate five nondeterministic methods: (1) Program evaluation review technique (PERT); (2) probabilistic network evaluation technique (PNET); (3) narrow reliability bounds (NRB), (4) Monte Carlo simulation (MCS); and (5) simplified Monte Carlo simulation (SMCS). To compare the five methods, the writers solved 31 networks using each of the methods. The results obtained by each method were compared and evaluated based on the survival function and computer time. The writers found that PERT is the simplest method and yields the most optimistic results, while MCS and SMCS produce the most conservative result. The gap between the survival function obtained with PERT and that obtained with the two simulation methods (MCS and SMCS) is wider for positively skewed distributions of network activities.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 57
页数:18
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
Ang A., Analysis of activity networks under uncertainty, J. Engrg. Mech, 101, 4, pp. 373-387, (1975)
[2]  
Diaz C.F., Probabilistic network analyses for construction projects, (1989)
[3]  
Ditlevsen O., Narrow reliability bounds for structural systems, J. Struct. Mech, 7, 4, pp. 453-472, (1979)
[4]  
Laferriere B.J., (1981)
[5]  
Moder J.J., Phillips C.R., Davis E.W., Project Management with CPM, PERT and Precedence Diagraming, (1983)
[6]  
O'Brien J., CPM in Construction Management, (1984)
[7]  
Patel J.K., Read C.B., Handbook of the Normal Distribution, (1982)
[8]  
Program Evaluation Research Task, Phase I Summary Report, (1958)