Assessment of the RPE as a measure of cardiovascular fitness in patients with low back pain

被引:1
|
作者
Finucane, Laura [1 ]
Fiddler, Helen [2 ]
Lindfield, Helen [3 ]
机构
[1] East Surrey Primary Care Trust, East Surrey Hosp, Outpatient Serv, Surrey RH1 5RH, England
[2] Univ Brighton, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, Sch Hlth Sci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
low back pain; cardiovascular fitness; rehabilitation; Rating of Perceived Exertion;
D O I
10.12968/ijtr.2005.12.3.19554
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Improving cardiovascular fitness is recognized as an important aspect in the rehabilitation of patients with chronic low back pain. The improvement of cardiovascular fitness relies on an individual exercising at a certain intensity. The Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) has been widely accepted as a way to monitor exercise intensity. This study aimed to determine the criterion validity and the test-retest reliability of the RPE in patients with chronic low back pain. In total, 30 subjects with chronic low back pain performed two identical submaximal graded cycle ergometer tests. Heart rate and oxygen consumption were recorded continuously using the Metamax oxygen analyser. Subjects reported RPE scores every minute. Strong correlations were found between the RPE and heart rate and RPE and oxygen consumption. The reliability of the RPE was examined using the Bland and Altman 95% limits of agreement statistical test. There were wide limits of agreement, with subjects' scores varying as much as four points between tests. The findings demonstrated that the RPE is a valid measure to monitor exercise intensity in those patients with chronic low back pain. However, its repeatability is questionable.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 111
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of variability in traction interventions for patients with low back pain: a systematic review
    Alrwaily, Muhammad
    Almutiri, Mohammed
    Schneider, Michael
    CHIROPRACTIC & MANUAL THERAPIES, 2018, 26
  • [32] Assessment of variability in traction interventions for patients with low back pain: a systematic review
    Muhammad Alrwaily
    Mohammed Almutiri
    Michael Schneider
    Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 26
  • [33] Pain perception in patients with intermittent low back pain
    Rasmussen, Hanne Rytz
    Temdrup, Pia Gaarslev
    Myburgh, Corrie
    Grunnet-Nilsson, Niels
    JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 31 (02) : 127 - 129
  • [34] Application of surface EMG topography in low back pain rehabilitation assessment
    Hu, Yong
    Mak, Joseph N. F.
    Luk, K. D. K.
    2007 3RD INTERNATIONAL IEEE/EMBS CONFERENCE ON NEURAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2007, : 557 - +
  • [35] Assessment and rehabilitation of chronic low back pain in baseball: part II
    Wasser, Joseph G.
    Zaremski, Jason L.
    Herman, Daniel C.
    Vincent, Heather K.
    RESEARCH IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 25 (02) : 231 - 243
  • [36] Extensibility and stiffness of the hamstrings in patients with nonspecific low back pain
    Halbertsma, JPK
    Göeken, LNH
    Hof, AL
    Groothoff, JW
    Eisma, WH
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2001, 82 (02): : 232 - 238
  • [37] Differences in Pain Processing Between Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain, Recurrent Low Back Pain, and Fibromyalgia
    Goubert, Dorien
    Danneels, Lieven
    Graven-Nielsen, Thomas
    Descheemaeker, Filip
    Meeus, Mira
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2017, 20 (04) : 307 - 318
  • [38] A clinical contrast: physical therapists with low back pain treating patients with low back pain
    Louw, Adriaan
    Puentedura, Emilio J.
    Zimney, Kory
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2015, 31 (08) : 562 - 567
  • [39] LOW-BACK-PAIN RATING-SCALE - VALIDATION OF A TOOL FOR ASSESSMENT OF LOW-BACK-PAIN
    MANNICHE, C
    ASMUSSEN, K
    LAURITSEN, B
    VINTERBERG, H
    KREINER, S
    JORDAN, A
    PAIN, 1994, 57 (03) : 317 - 326
  • [40] Predictors of communication preferences in patients with chronic low back pain
    Farin, Erik
    Gramm, Lukas
    Schmidt, Erika
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2013, 7 : 1117 - 1127