Validation of volume flow measurements with cine phase-contrast MR imaging for peripheral arterial waveforms

被引:35
作者
McCauley, TR
Pena, CS
Holland, CK
Price, TB
Gore, JC
机构
[1] Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
[2] Department of Radiology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, 12208
[3] Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
[4] Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
[5] Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
[6] Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
来源
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING | 1995年 / 5卷 / 06期
关键词
blood vessels; MR studies; sonographic studies; arteries; extremities; blood flow dynamics;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.1880050608
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A now phantom was used to study MR volume now measurements for monophasic and triphasic waveforms over the now range expected in peripheral arteries at rest and with exercise (2-24 mL/sec, n = 50). The improvement in accuracy with phase-correction image processing to eliminate errors caused by eddy currents was measured, Volume now estimates with Doppler sonography were also measured, MR volume now measurements correlated with volume collection with r = .996 and mean error = 4.6%, Phase-correction processing decreased mean error from 12.6% to 4.6% (P < .001, paired t-test), Doppler sonography had a higher mean error of 10.3% (P < .001, unpaired t-test). Cine phase-contrast MR imaging provides accurate estimates of volume blood now for waveforms and now ranges expected in peripheral arteries.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 668
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Sumner DS, Objective diagnostic techniques: role of the vascular laboratory, Vascular surgery, pp. 41-60, (1989)
[2]  
Gould KL, Kelley KO, Bolson EL, Experimental validation of quantitative coronary arteriography for determining pressure‐flow characteristics of coronary stenosis, Circulation, 66, pp. 930-937, (1982)
[3]  
Peterkin GA, Manabe S, LaMorte WW, Menzoian JO, Evaluation of a proposed standard reporting system for preoperative angiograms in infrainguinal bypass procedures: angiographic correlates of measured runoff resistance, J Vase Surg, 7, pp. 379-385, (1988)
[4]  
Kaufman SL, Fara JW, Udoff EJ, Harrington DP, White RI, Hemodynamic effects of vasodilators across iliac stenoses in dogs, Invest Radiol, 14, pp. 471-475, (1979)
[5]  
Udoff EJ, Barth KH, Harrington DP, Kaufman SL, White RI, Hemodynamic significance of iliac artery stenosis: pressure measurements during angiography, Radiology, 132, pp. 289-293, (1979)
[6]  
Holland CK, Taylor KJW, Blood flow quantitation: waveform analysis, volume measurement, tumor flow and the role of color imaging, Advances in ultrasound techniques and instrumentation, pp. 125-139, (1993)
[7]  
Holland CK, Clancy M, Taylor KJW, Alderman JL, Purushothaman K, McCauley TR
[8]  
Kilner P, Firmin D, Rees R, Et al., Valve and great vessel stenosis: assessment with MR jet velocity mapping, Radiology, 178, pp. 229-235, (1991)
[9]  
Wendt R, Rokey R, Wong W, Marks A, Magnetic resonance velocity measurements in small arteries: comparison with Doppler ultrasonic measurements in the aortas of normal rabbits, Invest Radiol, 27, pp. 499-503, (1992)
[10]  
Applegate G, Thaete L, Meyers S, Et al., Blood flow in the portal vein: velocity quantification with phase contrast MR angiography, Radiology, 187, pp. 253-256, (1993)