Mifepristone 5 mg versus 10 mg for emergency contraception: double-blind randomized clinical trial

被引:7
|
作者
Lluis Carbonell, Josep [1 ]
Garcia, Ramon [2 ]
Gonzalez, Adriana [2 ]
Breto, Andres [2 ]
Sanchez, Carlos [2 ]
机构
[1] Mediterranea Med Clin, Salvador Guinot 14, Valencia 46017, Spain
[2] Eusebio Hernandez Gynecol & Obstet Teaching Hosp, Havana, Cuba
关键词
mifepristone; emergency contraception;
D O I
10.2147/IJWH.S65793
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose: To estimate the efficacy and safety of 5 mg and 10 mg mifepristone for emergency contraception up to 144 hours after unprotected coitus. Methods: This double-blind randomized clinical trial was carried out at Eusebio Hernandez Hospital (Havana, Cuba). A total of 2,418 women who requested emergency contraception after unprotected coitus received either 5 mg or 10 mg mifepristone. The variables for assessing efficacy were the pregnancies that occurred and the fraction of pregnancies that were prevented. Other variables assessed were the side effects of mifepristone, vaginal bleeding, and changes in the date of the following menstruation. Results: There were 15/1,206 (1.2%) and 9/1,212 (0.7%) pregnancies in the 5 mg and 10 mg group, respectively (P=0.107). There were 88% and 93% prevented pregnancies in the 5 mg and 10 mg group, respectively. The side effect profiles were similar in both groups. Delayed menstruation >= 7 days was experienced by 4.9% and 11.0% of subjects in the 5 mg and 10 mg group, respectively (P=0.001). There was a significant high failure rate for women weighing >75 kg in the 5 mg group. Conclusion: It would be advisable to use the 10 mg dose of mifepristone for emergency contraception as there was a trend suggesting that the failure rate of the larger dose was lower.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 102
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Gestrinone Compared With Mifepristone for Emergency Contraception A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Wu, Shangchun
    Dong, Jing
    Cong, Jie
    Wang, Cuiping
    VonHertzen, Helena
    Godfrey, Emily M.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 115 (04): : 740 - 744
  • [42] Safety and effectiveness of different dosage of mifepristone for the treatment of uterine fibroids: a double-blind randomized clinical trial
    Carbonell, Josep Ll
    Acosta, Rita
    P, Yasmiriam Rez
    Marrero, Ana G.
    Trellez, Edilia
    Sanchez, Carlos
    Tomasi, Giuseppe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2013, 5 : 115 - 124
  • [43] Zonisamide Versus Topiramate in Migraine Prophylaxis: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
    Mohammadianinejad, Seyed Ehsan
    Abbasi, Vahid
    Sajedi, Seyed Aidin
    Majdinasab, Nastaran
    Abdollahi, Fahimeh
    Hajmanouchehri, Reza
    Faraji, Asal
    CLINICAL NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 34 (04) : 174 - 177
  • [44] A randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single-pill combination of telmisartan 80 mg/amlodipine 5 mg versus amlodipine 5 mg in hypertensive Asian patients
    Zhu, Dingliang
    Gao, Pingjin
    Holtbruegge, Werner
    Huang, Chenglei
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2014, 42 (01) : 52 - 66
  • [45] A randomized, double-blind trial of the efficacy and safety of 10 or 20 mg rabeprazole compared with 20 mg omeprazole in the maintenance of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease over 5 years
    Thjodleifsson, B
    Rindi, G
    Fiocca, R
    Humphries, TJ
    Morocutti, A
    Miller, N
    Bardhan, KD
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2003, 17 (03) : 343 - 351
  • [46] Efficacy and safety of bisoprolol 5 mg plus amlodipine 5 mg in patients with hypertension uncontrolled on monotherapy with 5 mg of amlodipine, a phase III multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial - the AMCOR study
    Jedrusik, Piotr
    Placha, Grzegorz
    Gaciong, Zbigniew
    AMCOR Trial Investigators
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2023, 39 (07) : 939 - 946
  • [47] Randomized, double-blind trial of 220 mg zinc sulfate twice daily in the treatment of rosacea
    Bamford, Joel T. M.
    Gessert, Charles E.
    Haller, Irina V.
    Kruger, Kim
    Johnson, Brian P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2012, 51 (04) : 459 - 462
  • [48] Randomized, double-blind comparison of 4 mg/kg versus 2 mg/kg intravenous cyclosporine in severe ulcerative colitis
    Van Assche, G
    D'Haens, G
    Noman, M
    Vermeire, S
    Hiele, M
    Asnong, K
    Arts, J
    D'Hoore, A
    Penninckx, F
    Rutgeerts, P
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 125 (04) : 1025 - 1031
  • [49] Randomized, double-blind trial of carisoprodol 250 mg compared with placebo and carisoprodol 350 mg for the treatment of low back spasm
    Serfer, Gregory T.
    Wheeler, William J.
    Sacks, Harry J.
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2010, 26 (01) : 91 - 99
  • [50] Efficacy and Safety of Duloxetine 60 mg and 120 mg Daily in Patients Hospitalized for Severe Depression: A Double-Blind Randomized Trial
    Brecht, Stephan
    Desaiah, Durisala
    Marechal, Elisete S.
    Santini, Ambra M.
    Podhorna, Jana
    Guelfi, Julien D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 72 (08) : 1086 - 1094