Systemic Evaluation of Electrical Stimulation for Ischemic Wound Therapy in a Preclinical In Vivo Model

被引:9
作者
Graebert, Jennifer K. [1 ]
Henzel, M. Kristi [1 ,2 ]
Honda, Kord S. [3 ]
Bogie, Kath M. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Med Ctr, APT Ctr Excellence, 151 AW APT,10701 East Blvd, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Dermatol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[4] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Orthoped & Biomed Engn, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/wound.2014.0534
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Objective: In a systematic preclinical investigation of ischemic wound healing, we investigated the hypothesis that electrical stimulation (ES) promotes the healing of ischemic wounds. Approach: The effects of varying clinically relevant ES variables were evaluated using our modified version of the Gould F344 rat ischemic wound model. Stimulation was delivered using the novel lightweight integrated, single-channel, current-controlled modular surface stimulation (MSS) device. Stepwise variation allowed the effects of five different stimulation paradigms within an appropriate current density range to be studied. Within each group, 8-10 animals were treated for 28 days or until the ischemic wounds were healed and 5 animals were treated for 12 days. Eight rats received sham devices. A quantitative multivariable outcomes assessment procedure was used to evaluate the effects of ES. Results: Ischemic wounds treated with a decreased interpulse interval (IPI) had the highest rate of complete wound closure at 3 weeks. Wounds treated with decreased pulse amplitude (PA) had a lower proportion of closed wounds than sham ischemic wounds and showed sustained inflammation with a lack of wound contraction. Innovation: Our systematic study of varying ES paradigms using the novel MSS device provides preliminary insight into potential mechanisms of ES in ischemic wound healing. Conclusion: Clinically appropriate ES can more than double the proportion of ischemic wounds closed by 3 weeks in this model. Ninety percent of wounds treated with a decreased IPI healed by 21 days compared with only 29% of ischemic wounds treated with decreased PA, which appears to inhibit healing.
引用
收藏
页码:428 / 437
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Electrical stimulation as an adjunct to spinal fusion: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials [J].
Akai, M ;
Kawashima, N ;
Kimura, T ;
Hayashi, K .
BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, 2002, 23 (07) :496-504
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Technol Eval Cent Assess Program Exec Summ, V20, P1
[3]  
Aziz Z, 2012, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V12, P12
[4]  
Bergstrom N, 1994, AHCPR PUBL, V95-0652
[5]   Electrical stimulation for pressure sore prevention and wound healing [J].
Bogie, KM ;
Reger, SI ;
Levine, SP ;
Sahgal, V .
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 12 (01) :50-66
[6]  
Clark M, WOUND INT, V4, P4
[7]  
Cullum N, 2001, Health Technol Assess, V5, P1
[8]   Macrophages in skin injury and repair [J].
Delavary, Babak Mahdavian ;
van der Veer, Willem M. ;
van Egmond, Marjolein ;
Niessen, Frank B. ;
Beelen, Robert H. J. .
IMMUNOBIOLOGY, 2011, 216 (07) :753-762
[9]  
Du Bois-Reymond EH, 1843, FISCHE
[10]  
European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, 2009, PREV TREATM PRESS UL