Covert Visual Search: Revisiting the Guided Search Paradigm

被引:0
作者
Engelke, Ulrich [1 ]
Duenser, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
Zeater, Anthony [3 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO, Cognit Informat, Sandy Bay, Australia
[2] CSIRO, Sandy Bay, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Covert Attention; Feature Integration; Guided Search; Overt Attention; Psychophysical Experiment; Response Times; Visual Attention; Visual Search;
D O I
10.4018/IJCINI.2014070102
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Selective attention is an important cognitive resource to account for when designing effective human-machine interaction and cognitive computing systems. Much of our knowledge about attention processing stems from search tasks that are usually framed around Treisman's feature integration theory and Wolfe's Guided Search. However, search performance in these tasks has mainly been investigated using an overt attention paradigm. Covert attention on the other hand has hardly been investigated in this context. To gain a more thorough understanding of human attentional processing and especially covert search performance, the authors have experimentally investigated the relationship between overt and covert visual search for targets under a variety of target/distractor combinations. The overt search results presented in this work agree well with the Guided Search studies by Wolfe et al. The authors show that the response times are considerably more influenced by the target/distractor combination than by the attentional search paradigm deployed. While response times are similar between the overt and covert search conditions, they found that error rates are considerably higher in covert search. They further show that response times between participants are stronger correlated as the search task complexity increases. The authors discuss their findings and put them into the context of earlier research on visual search.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 28
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Visual search
    Chan, Louis K. H.
    Hayward, William G.
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2013, 4 (04) : 415 - 429
  • [32] You detect while I search: examining visual search efficiency in a joint search task
    McDonnell, Gerald P.
    Mills, Mark
    Marshall, Jordan E.
    Zosky, Joshua E.
    Dodd, Michael D.
    VISUAL COGNITION, 2018, 26 (02) : 71 - 88
  • [33] Involvement of the human frontal eye field and multiple parietal areas in covert visual selection during conjunction search
    Donner, T
    Kettermann, A
    Diesch, E
    Ostendorf, F
    Villringer, A
    Brandt, SA
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 12 (09) : 3407 - 3414
  • [34] Binocularity and visual search—Revisited
    Bochao Zou
    Igor S. Utochkin
    Yue Liu
    Jeremy M. Wolfe
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2017, 79 : 473 - 483
  • [35] Visual search deficits in amblyopia
    Tsirlin, Inna
    Colpa, Linda
    Goltz, Herbert C.
    Wong, Agnes M. F.
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2018, 18 (04): : 1 - 16
  • [36] The Serial Process In Visual Search
    Gilden, David L.
    Thornton, Thomas L.
    Marusich, Laura R.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2010, 36 (03) : 533 - 542
  • [37] Visual attention in spatial cueing and visual search
    Baek, Jongsoo
    Dosher, Barbara Anne
    Lu, Zhong-Lin
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2021, 21 (03): : 1 - 24
  • [38] The degree of human visual attention in the visual search
    Hiroaki Mizuhara
    Jing-Long Wu
    Yoshikazu Nishikawa
    Artificial Life and Robotics, 2000, 4 (2) : 57 - 61
  • [39] Visual Saliency Improves Autonomous Visual Search
    Rasouli, Amir
    Tsotsos, John K.
    2014 CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND ROBOT VISION (CRV), 2014, : 111 - 118
  • [40] Prioritization in visual search: Visual marking is not dependent on a mnemonic search
    Christian N. L. Olivers
    Glyn W. Humphreys
    Dietmar Heinke
    Adam C. G. Cooper
    Perception & Psychophysics, 2002, 64 : 540 - 560