Diurnal IOP-lowering efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004% compared with tafluprost 0.0015% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension

被引:18
作者
Schnober, Dietmar
Hofmann, Gunter
Maier, Hubert
Scherzer, Maria-Luise
Ogundele, Abayomi B. [1 ]
Jasek, Mark C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Alcon Labs Inc, Ft Worth, TX 76101 USA
来源
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2010年 / 4卷
关键词
glaucoma; intraocular pressure; prostaglandin analog; tafluprost; travoprost;
D O I
10.2147/OPTH.S13720
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004% and tafluprost 0.0015% administered to patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Methods: This was a randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, crossover design trial, in which patients were randomized to either travoprost or tafluprost monotherapy administered once daily in the evening for six weeks and then crossed over to the alternative treatment for another six weeks. Diurnal IOP was measured (8 am to 8 pm, every two hours) and a solicited symptom survey was administered at the end of both six-week periods, as was conjunctival hyperemia and visual acuity assessment, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and adverse event solicitation. Results: Fifty-one patients were randomized and 48 patients completed the study. The 12-hour mean diurnal IOP was significantly lower with travoprost therapy than with tafluprost therapy (P = 0.01), and a significantly lower IOP was also reported for travoprost at five of the seven individual time points (P < 0.05). Neither therapy produced a significant increase from baseline in any of the individual patient-reported symptom scores, except for hyperemia (P <= 0.01), which was increased with both treatments. Investigator-observed hyperemia was also increased from baseline with both therapies (P < 0.01), although the increase with travoprost therapy was significantly smaller than with tafluprost (P < 0.01). No additional safety concerns were noted from slit-lamp biomicroscopy or visual acuity results, and no difference was noted in patient-reported tolerability of the two medications. Conclusion: Travoprost 0.004% monotherapy produced lower diurnal IOP than tafluprost 0.0015% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and exhibited a similar safety profile.
引用
收藏
页码:1459 / 1463
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
*ALC LAB INC, 2004, TRAV PACK INS
[2]  
Asrani S, 2000, J GLAUCOMA, V9, P134
[3]  
European Glaucoma Society, 2020, TERM GUID GLAUC, V5th
[4]   Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression - Results from the early manifest glaucoma trial [J].
Heijl, A ;
Leske, MC ;
Bengtsson, B ;
Hyman, L ;
Bengtsson, B ;
Hussein, M .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 120 (10) :1268-1279
[5]   The side effects of the postaglandin analogues [J].
Hollo, Gabor .
EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2007, 6 (01) :45-52
[6]   Analytic review of bimatoprost, latanoprost and travoprost in primary open angle glaucoma [J].
Holmstrom, S ;
Buchholz, P ;
Walt, J ;
Wickstrom, J ;
Aagren, M .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2005, 21 (11) :1875-1883
[7]   Factors associated with long-term progression or stability in exfoliation glaucoma [J].
Konstas, AGP ;
Hollo, G ;
Astakhov, YS ;
Teus, MA ;
Akopov, EL ;
Jenkins, JN ;
Stewart, WC .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2004, 122 (01) :29-33
[8]   Efficacy and safety of latanoprost versus travoprost in exfoliative glaucoma patients [J].
Konstas, Anastasios G. P. ;
Kozobolis, Vassilios P. ;
Katsimpris, Ioannis E. ;
Boboridis, Kostantinos ;
Koukoula, Stavrenia ;
Jenkins, Jessica N. ;
Stewart, William C. .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 114 (04) :653-657
[9]   CORRELATION BETWEEN INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE CONTROL AND PROGRESSIVE GLAUCOMATOUS DAMAGE IN PRIMARY OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA [J].
MAO, LK ;
STEWART, WC ;
SHIELDS, MB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1991, 111 (01) :51-55
[10]   Travoprost compared with latanoprost and timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension [J].
Netland, PA ;
Landry, T ;
Sullivan, EK ;
Andrew, R ;
Silver, L ;
Weiner, A ;
Mallick, S ;
Dickerson, J ;
Bergamini, MVW ;
Robertson, SM ;
Davis, AA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 132 (04) :472-484