Outcomes and complications of fibular head resection

被引:12
作者
Agarwal, D. K. [1 ]
Saseendar, S. [1 ]
Patro, D. K. [1 ]
Menon, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] JIPMER, Dept Orthoped, Pondicherry, India
来源
STRATEGIES IN TRAUMA AND LIMB RECONSTRUCTION | 2012年 / 7卷 / 01期
关键词
Fibula; Bone transplantation; Morbidity; Joint laxity; Fibular regeneration;
D O I
10.1007/s11751-012-0133-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The fibular head is often used as donor graft material for reconstruction of defects of the distal radius. However little is known on the safety of such a procedure. This report describes the long-term donor-site morbidity following the procedure. Fourteen patients who underwent simple or marginal resections of the proximal fibula between 1990 and 2007 were reviewed. Subjective donorsite morbidity, knee and ankle range of motion and instability, presence of sensory or motor function loss, gait and fibular regeneration were assessed. The mean age at surgery was 25 years; six were male, eight were female and the mean follow-up was 11 years. Abnormal clinical findings were present in 10 patients (71.4 %): nine patients (64.3 %) had Grade 2 varus laxity at the knee confirmed by stress radiographs; one had sensory loss in the distribution of the superficial peroneal nerve. Patients with varus laxity had significantly higher mean age at surgery than those without varus laxity (p = 0.001). None had deformity at the knee or ankle. The range of joint movements was normal. All had a normal tibiotalar angle and none had proximal migration of the fibula. One patient demonstrated near-complete regeneration of the fibula. Donor-site morbidity following simple and marginal resection of the proximal fibula is acceptable. Older patients had a higher risk of demonstrable varus laxity at the knee but proximal fibula resection in children appears to be safe.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 32
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] ANDERSON AF, 1991, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P137
  • [2] ANKLE INSTABILITY AFTER FIBULAR RESECTION
    BABHULKAR, SS
    PANDE, KC
    BABHULKAR, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1995, 77B (02): : 258 - 261
  • [3] Bassiony AA, 2009, ANN ACAD MED SINGAP, V38, P900
  • [4] Regeneration of the donor side after autogenous fibula transplantation in 53 patients -: Evaluation by dual X-ray absorptiometry
    Bettin, D
    Böhm, H
    Clatworthy, M
    Zurakowski, D
    Link, TM
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 74 (03): : 332 - 336
  • [5] Bickels J, 2006, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V454, P198
  • [6] JOINT HYPERMOBILITY LEADING TO OSTEOARTHROSIS AND CHONDROCALCINOSIS
    BIRD, HA
    TRIBE, CR
    BACON, PA
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1978, 37 (03) : 203 - 211
  • [7] Donor-site morbidity after free vascularized autogenous fibular transfer: Subjective and quantitative analyses
    Bodde, EWH
    de Visser, E
    Duysens, JEJ
    Hartman, EHM
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 111 (07) : 2237 - 2242
  • [8] Proximal fibula resection in the treatment of bone tumours
    Dieckmann, Ralf
    Gebert, Carsten
    Streitbuerger, Arne
    Henrichs, Marcel-Philipp
    Dirksen, Uta
    Roedl, Robert
    Gosheger, Georg
    Hardes, Jendrik
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2011, 35 (11) : 1689 - 1694
  • [9] THE EFFECTS OF RESECTION OF THE PROXIMAL PART OF THE FIBULA ON STABILITY OF THE KNEE AND ON GAIT
    DRAGANICH, LF
    NICHOLAS, RW
    SHUSTER, JK
    SATHY, MR
    CHANG, AF
    SIMON, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1991, 73A (04) : 575 - 583
  • [10] EDELMAN R, 1992, Journal of Foot Surgery, V31, P368