DEMOCRACY IN THE JUDICIARY

被引：0
作者：
Barreto Lima, Martonio Mont'Alverne [1 ]
机构：
[1] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
来源：
REVISTA DIREITO E LIBERDADE | 2005年 / 1卷 / 01期
关键词：
Judiciary; Judicial Reform; Democratic culture; Brazilian state;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号：
0301 ;
摘要：
The judiciary in Brazil has been one of the main institutions that deserves the most severe criticism, whether by society, whether on the side of intellectuals and even its members. The slowness of justice facilities and all the material difficulties are revealing only of the less problematic parts of the situation of the judiciary. In fact, the central concern is the democratization of the judiciary, in its transformation to become an instrument of democracy and the transparency, not an autonomous bureaucratic status of the state itself. The text faces this discussion for the establishment of the so-called democratic culture within the judiciary and its impact on its structural change.
引用
收藏
页码：317 / 330
页数：14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Is there a gender pay gap in the Brazilian judiciary?
    Severi, Fabiana Cristina
    de Jesus Filho, Jose
    REVISTA DE ADMINISTRACAO PUBLICA, 2022, 56 (02): : 208 - 225
  • [32] Educating the Principles of Judiciary in Eastern Europe
    Treskov, Aleksej P.
    Markhgeym, Marina, V
    Matyusheva, Tatiana N.
    Mikhaleva, Galina G.
    Tkhabisimova, Lyudmila A.
    PROPOSITOS Y REPRESENTACIONES, 2020, 8 (03):
  • [33] Counter-reform in the spanish judiciary
    Iniguez Hernandez, Diego
    TEORIA Y REALIDAD CONSTITUCIONAL, 2014, 34 : 333 - 348
  • [34] Labour disputes, investment decisions and the judiciary
    Deffains, Bruno
    Gabuthy, Yannick
    Lambert, Eve-Angeline
    LABOUR ECONOMICS, 2010, 17 (02) : 424 - 433
  • [35] Law and the Judiciary: Divides and Dissent in Malaysia
    Sharom, Azmi
    SOUTHEAST ASIAN STUDIES, 2018, 7 (03) : 391 - 413
  • [36] The Interaction of the Parliament and the Judiciary of the Russian Federation
    Koshel, Alexey S.
    TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL, 2020, (460): : 258 - 264
  • [37] Artificial intelligence in the judiciary: A critical view
    Dias, Stephanie Almeida de Jesus
    Satiro, Renato Maximo
    FUTURES, 2024, 164
  • [38] The cage of freedom — law, justice and the judiciary
    Heusel W.
    ERA Forum, 2021, 22 (1) : 51 - 57
  • [39] The Judiciary as Garant of Personal Data in Albania
    Mataj, R.
    RETHINKING SOCIAL ACTION. CORE VALUES, 2015, : 773 - 779
  • [40] European legal standards of digitalization of the judiciary
    Najafli, Emin
    Ponomarov, Sergiy
    Koverznev, Vadym
    Ivanov, Andrii
    AMAZONIA INVESTIGA, 2024, 13 (76): : 113 - 127
12345